Analysis of Uncertainty in a Middle-Cost Device for 3D Measurements in BIM Perspective

Abstract

Medium-cost devices equipped with sensors are being developed to get 3D measurements. Some allow for generating geometric models and point clouds. Nevertheless, the accuracy of these measurements should be evaluated, taking into account the requirements of the Building Information Model (BIM). This paper analyzes the uncertainty in outdoor/indoor three-dimensional coordinate measures and point clouds (using Spherical Accuracy Standard (SAS) methods) for Eyes Map, a medium-cost tablet manufactured by e-Capture Research & Development Company, Mérida, Spain. To achieve it, in outdoor tests, by means of this device, the coordinates of targets were measured from 1 to 6 m and cloud points were obtained. Subsequently, these were compared to the coordinates of the same targets measured by a Total Station. The Euclidean average distance error was 0.005–0.027 m for measurements by Photogrammetry and 0.013–0.021 m for the point clouds. All of them satisfy the tolerance for point cloud acquisition (0.051 m) according to the BIM Guide for 3D Imaging (General Services Administration); similar results are obtained in the indoor tests, with values of 0.022 m. In this paper, we establish the optimal distances for the observations in both, Photogrammetry and 3D Photomodeling modes (outdoor) and point out some working conditions to avoid in indoor environments. Finally, the authors discuss some recommendations for improving the performance and working methods of the device.

A Self-Assembly Portable Mobile Mapping System for Archeological Reconstruction Based on VSLAM-Photogrammetric Algorithm

“…These combined methods provide support and analytical robustness for the development of low/middle-cost capture systems, usually based on tablets or mobile devices that incorporate inertial sensors, absolute positioning and low cost cameras which can achieve medium 3D positional accuracy scanning, in compliance with technical requirements of a wide range of applications at a low cost and reduced learning curve [24,25,26,27,28]. As a result, handheld mobile mapping systems have appeared in recent years, using different technologies to perform 3D reconstructions that use fully automated processes [27,28]. Among which we can find systems based exclusively on images, requiring a fully automated process, taking into account the usual technical constraints in photogrammetry, and the free user movements in data capture [17].…”

Geometric characterization and interactive 3D visualization of historical and cultural heritage in the province of Cáceres (Spain)

“…It is now often used for 3D object modeling in GIS in various fields such as civil engineering and archaeology (Xu, Yang, & Neumann, 2015).The latter highlights the work aimed at the conservation of cultural heritage (Fanti, Gigli, Lombardi, Tapete, & Canuti, 2013;Calin et al, 2015;Rüther et al, 2009;Logothetis & Stylianidis, 2016;Sánchez, Naranjo, Jiménez, & González, 2016).…”

Performance Investigation of a Handheld 3d Scanner To Define Good Practices for Small Artefact 3d Modeling

“…A theoretical error model that could be applied to most of handheld scanners is rather hard to define, and it would vary depending on the measurement technique applied. For this reason, works dedicated to the study of handheld 3D scanners (Boehm, 2014;Eiríksson et al, 2016;Kersten et al, 2016;Sánchez et al, 2016) are mainly based on a practical assessment of the data that these devices produce.…”