2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2007.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of underivatized gentamicin by capillary electrophoresis with UV detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to these regulations and the potential dangers of gentamicin residues remaining in foods, it is necessary to have a detection method that is capable of detecting such low concentrations of the JFDS-2017-1753Submitted 10/25/2017, Accepted 4/9/2018 antibiotic. Existing methods for gentamicin detection include immunoassays (Chen, Li, He, Tang, & Xiao, 2010), HPLC (Kuehl, 2012), and capillary electrophoresis (Curiel, Vanderaerden, Velez, Hoogmartens, & Van Schepdael, 2007). These methods tend to be labor intensive, require expensive equipment, or do not have a sufficiently low limit of detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to these regulations and the potential dangers of gentamicin residues remaining in foods, it is necessary to have a detection method that is capable of detecting such low concentrations of the JFDS-2017-1753Submitted 10/25/2017, Accepted 4/9/2018 antibiotic. Existing methods for gentamicin detection include immunoassays (Chen, Li, He, Tang, & Xiao, 2010), HPLC (Kuehl, 2012), and capillary electrophoresis (Curiel, Vanderaerden, Velez, Hoogmartens, & Van Schepdael, 2007). These methods tend to be labor intensive, require expensive equipment, or do not have a sufficiently low limit of detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The separation and detection of amikacin and urea have been a great challenge, due to the lack of UV absorbing properties. Various methods have been applied for determination of aminoglycosides in various matrices, including microbiological assay [3], radioenzymatic assay [4], immunoassays [5], liquid chromatography (LC) [6][7][8][9] and capillary electrophoresis (CE) [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Several of these methods used precolumn or postcolumn derivatization with either UV or fluorescence detection [6,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, in combination with LC, pulsed electrochemical detection (PED) is advisable [7][8][9]. Combined with CE, borate complexation [17], indirect UV detection [12], amperometric detection [18] and UV detection, performed in Tris buffer at pH 9.1 with high concentration of sodium pentanesulfonate (SPS) [10] or in pyrophosphate buffer [11] have been described for the analysis of aminoglycosides. However, these CE methods are neither very sensitive nor selective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indirect methods required pre- or post-column derivatization with either UV [10–13] or fluorescence detection [1417] or CE [18, 19], were time consuming, tedious and not accurate enough. Direct methods included detection techniques such as refractive index (RI) [20], ELSD [21, 22], CAD [23], CE [24], ED [25, 26] or MS [2729]. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods were discussed in [7, 23, 30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%