2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-018-2766-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of unexpected small cell lung cancer following surgery as the primary treatment

Abstract: Purpose Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is considered a systemic disease and surgery is generally not recommended to treat it. High heterogeneity within the tumor and preoperative diagnostic capabilities can sometimes fail to identify SCLC correctly, leading to a subset of unexpected SCLC patients that are diagnosed only after pulmonary resections. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients who were diagnosed as having SCLC only after surgery between 2008 and 2015 at a single institutio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data in this study were based on our previous studies of patients with surgically resected SCLC (23)(24)(25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data in this study were based on our previous studies of patients with surgically resected SCLC (23)(24)(25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several reports on the successful treatment of SCLC using surgical resection have been published (28, 29). However, due to lack of a control group and a relatively small sample size, the results have been considered less convincing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of Liu et al [21], the rate of subpulmonary lobectomy in stage I patients reached 31%; neither this study nor previous studies found that subpulmonary lobectomy did not bring a survival bene t to stage I patients [22]. A portion of studies stated that lobectomy led to a more satisfactory prognosis than subpulmonary lobectomy [21,23,24], and the prognosis after lobectomy and subpulmonary lobectomy was superior to that after pneumonectomy [25]. In the present study, the patients underwent subpulmonary lobectomy, lobectomy, or compound lobectomy (including pneumonectomy), and the survival curve showed that the prognosis after subpulmonary lobectomy was worse (Fig.…”
Section: Survival Analysismentioning
confidence: 83%