2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of usage and associated cost of external fixators at an urban level 1 trauma centre

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If this novel external fixator is applied in a clinical setting after appropriate verification and validation techniques dictated by global or local regulatory health agencies, it would be readily accessible to the average patient. In a retrospective study, the cost associated with current definitive fixation for femoral shaft in a clinical setting was on average $15, 374 [19]. Fixation devices used in other applications had a cost which ranged from $3556 to $20,486.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this novel external fixator is applied in a clinical setting after appropriate verification and validation techniques dictated by global or local regulatory health agencies, it would be readily accessible to the average patient. In a retrospective study, the cost associated with current definitive fixation for femoral shaft in a clinical setting was on average $15, 374 [19]. Fixation devices used in other applications had a cost which ranged from $3556 to $20,486.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent estimate of direct costs of temporary external fixators used for damage control application in pelvic injuries and lower extremity fractures at the authors' institution revealed an average cost of $5900 per fixator frame construct and implant costs of $670,805 annually. 41 In contrast, a nonthreaded stainless steel Kwire costs approximately $8. Thus, a conservative estimate of $20 per dual-wire ankle pinning extrapolates to a 300fold decrease in implant costs compared with an average spanning external fixator construct.…”
Section: N Trauma Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a conservative estimate of $20 per dual-wire ankle pinning extrapolates to a 300fold decrease in implant costs compared with an average spanning external fixator construct. 41 From a biomechanical perspective, another evident benefit of ankle pinning is the achievement of rigid stability and retention of tibiotalar joint reduction by transarticular K-wires, compared with the relative stability by spanning external fixators allowing residual micromotion at the ankle joint. Figure 4 shows an example of damage control pin transfixation for a Limitations of this study include the design of a retrospective analysis of a prospective database, the shortcomings of a CPT-based data query, and the small study cohort of 13 patients.…”
Section: N Trauma Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economic considerations and non-availability of orthopaedic implants for large animals at the field level makes compound fractures non-treatable. In human medicine, the majority of external fixators are intended as "single-use" temporary frames, in place for a limited period of time prior to definitive fixation of skeletal injuries (Chaus et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%