2014
DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2013.863362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of vehicle rollover dynamics using a high-fidelity model

Abstract: Citation: CZECHOWICZ, M.P. and MAVROS, G., 2014. Analysis of vehicle rollover dynamics using a high-fidelity model. Vehicle System Dynamics, 52 (5), pp. 608636. At the same time experimental testing to improve safety is expensive and dangerous. Therefore multi-body simulation is used in this research to improve understanding of rollover dynamics. The majority of previous work uses low fidelity models. Here a complex and highly nonlinear multibody model with 165 degrees of freedom is correlated to vehicle kinem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some references have also suggested revised forms of this static RI that include suspension effects. 1,[3][4][5] The other suggested static RIs such as Side Pull Ratio and Tilt Table Ratio 1,6 are obtained from the experiments and are very close to the SSF. In order to have more accurate rollover indicators for dynamic situations, different dynamic RIs are also proposed that include vehicle states.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Some references have also suggested revised forms of this static RI that include suspension effects. 1,[3][4][5] The other suggested static RIs such as Side Pull Ratio and Tilt Table Ratio 1,6 are obtained from the experiments and are very close to the SSF. In order to have more accurate rollover indicators for dynamic situations, different dynamic RIs are also proposed that include vehicle states.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Though SSF gives a strong correlation with real world rollover, there are other factors responsible such as vehicle handling, loading, tyre properties and suspension kinematics. 40,41 Nevertheless, the key kinematic and compliance characteristics affecting rollover propensity are the front and rear suspension rates, front roll stiffness, front camber gain, front and rear camber compliances, and rear jacking force. 40 In addition to these, the dynamic behaviour is also affected by the CG location, weight split across wheels, and the driver’s performance.…”
Section: Methods To Check Rollover Propensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NHTSA recommended that tests like the fishhook, lane change and constant turning radius manoeuvres are performed to evaluate the rollover propensity of any vehicle. 21,23,41 These tests are equally applicable to 3Ws and have been used by many authors to demonstrate rollover resistance and manoeuvrability improvement with their proposed active tilt control systems in both simulations and experiments. 26,27,[42][43][44][45][46][47]…”
Section: Methods Adopted For Testing Tilt-controlled Vehiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-body dynamics equations (14) and (15) are sparsely coupled differential algebraic equations (DAEs). To solve the DAEs, the first job is to convert the algebraic equations into ordinary differential equations (ODEs).…”
Section: Modeling Of Full Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%