2007
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of verbal interactions during an extended, open‐inquiry general chemistry laboratory investigation

Abstract: This study explores effects of participation by second‐semester college general chemistry students in an extended, open‐inquiry laboratory investigation. Verbal interactions among a student lab team and with their instructor over three open‐inquiry laboratory sessions and two non‐inquiry sessions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. Coding categories were developed using the constant comparison method. Findings indicate that, during open‐inquiry activities, the student team interacted less often, sought l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
9

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
46
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore students became confident in their understanding of the part for which they were responsible and therefore took on a more active role in the discussions concerning that part of the task. 8 Metacognition has been defined as exercising control over, being in touch with or reflecting on one's own thinking. 9 Metacognition is embedded in scientific inquiry because successful inquiry requires a scientist to constantly reflect on and direct his/her thinking towards the desired outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore students became confident in their understanding of the part for which they were responsible and therefore took on a more active role in the discussions concerning that part of the task. 8 Metacognition has been defined as exercising control over, being in touch with or reflecting on one's own thinking. 9 Metacognition is embedded in scientific inquiry because successful inquiry requires a scientist to constantly reflect on and direct his/her thinking towards the desired outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutions following open inquiry methods claim that students achieve higher skills and practices and engage in higher order thinking [15,16]. The student's functioning corresponds closely to the teacher's efforts to facilitate the student's scientific literacy, creativity, initiative, responsibility, and motivation [17].…”
Section: Structured Guided and Open Inquiry Approaches: Advantages Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They claim that open inquiry is considered to be a waste of time, whereas guided inquiry provides high level science skills and helps in understanding the nature of science (Blanchard et al, 2010;Quintana, Zhang, & Krajcik, 2005;Tabak et al, 1995). On the contrary, some scholars (Berg et al, 2003;Chinn & Malhotra 2002;Krystyniak & Heikkinen, 2007) advocate that open inquiry is a more effective way to teach the nature of science and science process skills. This situation led us to include science process skills as a variable in this study.…”
Section: Extended Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ayrıca yönlendirmeli sorgulamanın hem öğrencilerin boşa giden zamanlarını hem de başarısızlık duygusu ile bir sonuca ulaşamama korkusunu azalttığını ifade etmektedirler (Trautmann, MaKinster, & Avery, 2004). Bu araştırmacılara karşı olan bazı araştırmacılar ise açık sorgulamanın öğrencilerin bilimsel bilimin doğasını, araştırma becerilerini ve üst düzey düşünmeyi daha iyi geliştirdiğini ifade etmektedirler (Berg, Bergendahl, Lundberg, & Tibell, 2003;Chinn & Malthora, 2002;Krystyniak & Heikkinen, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified