2019
DOI: 10.3126/tj.v1i1.27583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Watersheds in Gandaki Province, Nepal Using QGIS

Abstract: Gandaki province has the good potentiality of hydro-electricity generation with existing twenty-nine hydro-electricity projects. Since the Province is rich in water resources, analysis of watersheds needs to be done for management, planning and identification of water as well as natural resources. GIS offers integration of spatial and no spatial data to understand and analyze the watershed processes and helps in drawing a plan for integrated watershed development and management. The Digital Elevation Model (DE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is important to better understand how water interacts with the landscape. Flow accumulation is standard procedure in watershed analysis [11] and has been used in fields as diverse as agriculture [12] and plate fault lines [13]. In our study, flow accumulation provided the ability to understand archaeological patterns by matching positions of current flow channels and low points against what is known to have existed in the past, and opens the opportunity to question if current features are the legacy of previously unknown anthropogenic landscape alterations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus, it is important to better understand how water interacts with the landscape. Flow accumulation is standard procedure in watershed analysis [11] and has been used in fields as diverse as agriculture [12] and plate fault lines [13]. In our study, flow accumulation provided the ability to understand archaeological patterns by matching positions of current flow channels and low points against what is known to have existed in the past, and opens the opportunity to question if current features are the legacy of previously unknown anthropogenic landscape alterations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%