2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of wave propagation and soil–structure interaction using a perfectly matched layer model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of PML was proposed by B erenger 26 to simulate an absorbing boundary condition for electromagnetic wave propagation in an unbounded domain. The application of PML is not limited to electromagnetic wave and has been spread to elastic wave [27][28][29] and acoustic wave. [30][31][32][33] Based on theories of PML to attenuate acoustic wave, 34 we truncate the infinite fluid domain by PML and discretize the unit cell by finite element method.…”
Section: An Important Cornerstone -Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of PML was proposed by B erenger 26 to simulate an absorbing boundary condition for electromagnetic wave propagation in an unbounded domain. The application of PML is not limited to electromagnetic wave and has been spread to elastic wave [27][28][29] and acoustic wave. [30][31][32][33] Based on theories of PML to attenuate acoustic wave, 34 we truncate the infinite fluid domain by PML and discretize the unit cell by finite element method.…”
Section: An Important Cornerstone -Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erefore they participate in the calculation of equivalent seismic loads, and thus the restrictions on the applied artificial boundaries are more severe in BSM. Namely, they need to be the stress-type boundary conditions (such as the viscous boundaries [16] and the viscoelastic boundaries [17,18]), while the displacement-type artificial boundaries such as transmitting boundaries [14,15] or the perfectly matched layers [12,13] are not applicable in BSM. e original and modified ISMs avoid the participation of the artificial boundaries in the process of equivalent loads calculation by spatially separating the input of seismic waves and the absorption of scattered waves.…”
Section: Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e representative achievements in the artificial boundaries include the boundary element method [9,10], the infinite element method [11], perfectly matched layers [12,13], transmitting boundaries [14,15], viscous boundaries [16], viscoelastic boundaries [17,18], and exact absorbing boundaries [19,20]. However, due to the application of the artificial boundaries, a new problem appears in inputting the seismic waves into the finite model without affecting the transmission of outgoing waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bechache et al [2] modeled heterogeneous media with complex topographies using fictitious domains, mixed finite elements and perfectly matched layer technique. Surface strip foundation over a homogeneous or stratified half-plane was also examined by some researchers in order to further develop, verify and calibrate the FE/PML towards proper selection of PML parameters [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. However, all previous studies are restricted to discrete inhomogeneity and 2D analysis of wave propagation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%