2017
DOI: 10.1142/s0218396x17500230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Wave Scattering from a Viscoelastic Layer with Complex Shape

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transducer has a dominant frequency of 500 kHz and a broad-beam radiation pattern, as the width of the main lobe is 35° at -3 dB. This radiation pattern allows for a large area to be illuminated and therefore more 3D effects to be captured, e.g., interaction of waves with multiple topographic features and multiple wave scattering (Favretto-Cristini et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The transducer has a dominant frequency of 500 kHz and a broad-beam radiation pattern, as the width of the main lobe is 35° at -3 dB. This radiation pattern allows for a large area to be illuminated and therefore more 3D effects to be captured, e.g., interaction of waves with multiple topographic features and multiple wave scattering (Favretto-Cristini et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons of numerical and laboratory datasets showed that the DKIM could correctly reproduce the wavefield, except in the vicinity of secondary shadow boundaries created by the interaction of the edges of the topographic structures. As a follow up of the work of Tantsereva et al (2014), Favretto-Cristini et al (2017 quantitatively analyzed the effect of multiple scattering and surface curvature on the wavefield, in order to define the cases where these effects may be neglected in the numerical modeling without a significant loss of accuracy. These works clearly show the importance of laboratory datasets as part of the benchmarking options for numerical algorithms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons of numerical and laboratory data sets have shown that the DKIM could correctly reproduce the wavefield, except in the vicinity of shadow zones created by the interaction on the edges of the topographic structures. More importantly, a quantitative analysis of the effect of multiple scattering and the surface curvature on the wavefield has been then performed to define the cases where these effects may be neglected in the numerical modeling, in order to decrease the computational cost while maintaining a high accuracy (Favretto-Cristini et al, 2017). These works clearly show the importance of laboratory experiments as part of the benchmarking options for numerical algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the choice of the appropriate reflection/transmisison coefficients (planewave, spherical-wave, effective) is a trade-off between computational cost/speed and quality/accuracy. For instance, Favretto-Cristini et al (2017) have shown that, depending on the interface geometry (curvature, slope...), considering effective reflection coefficients may lead to large computational costs and is not mandatory to reach a largely acceptable accuracy of the results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%