2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.04.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of wheelchair rugby accelerations with fractal dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Horizontal frame rotation estimates were used to correct the wheel gyroscope signal for wheel camber angle, as described by Pansiot et al (2011), Fuss et al (2012) and van der Slikke et al…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Horizontal frame rotation estimates were used to correct the wheel gyroscope signal for wheel camber angle, as described by Pansiot et al (2011), Fuss et al (2012) and van der Slikke et al…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this may result in an abundance of sometimes hard to interpret kinematic data. Usma et al (2010) used IMUs to determine performance of wheelchair rugby players in a standard agility test while Fuss et al (2012) used fractal dimension analysis of frame acceleration to identify activity patterns during wheelchair rugby match play. A newly developed method utilizing IMUs (van der Slikke et al, 2015a) appeared reliable for measuring an extensive set of wheelchair kinematic outcomes, but was not yet applied in actual match play and lacked usability for sports practice given the bulk of outcomes provided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acceleration of a wheelchair recorded at 60 Hz during a wheelchair rugby match (data from [15]) against time (bottom subfigure); fractal dimension D H (running average with a window width of 151 data points over 2.5 s) of the acceleration signal calculated with three different methods (middle subfigure): Higuchi's [7] method, Raghavendra and Dutt's [9] MRBC, and the method developed in this study (cf. Section 4); top subfigure: absolute difference in D H between the three methods.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acceleration of a wheelchair recorded at 60 Hz during a wheelchair rugby match (data from [15]) against time (c); the two arrows refer to the time data with the lowest and highest D H used for determining the amplitude spectrum of Figure 11; (b) fractal dimension D Hm (running average with a window width of 151 data points over 2.5 s) of the acceleration signal calculated for different amplitude multipliers m (cf. Figure 11); note that the fractal dimension at m → ∞ corresponds to the one calculated with Higuchi's method in Figure 2; (a) optimised D Hm at m = 0.8.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods and results of this paper validate the new algorithm against known baselines to evidence the accuracy and validity of the measurements. This algorithm can be linked with other algorithms-for example, Fuss et al's [7] fractional dimensioning approach to classify in-game activities or Bergamini et al's [3] measurement of wrist synchronicity-to provide coaches with enhanced information, pertinent understanding, and improved performance, mitigating against injury and improving wheelchair design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%