1992
DOI: 10.1109/58.156177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of worst-case phase quantization sidelobes in focused beamforming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that whilst the maximum tolerable phase error is expressed as a path length or phase difference, where λ is the wavelength of the center frequency of the excitation pulse in the medium, it can also be represented using the following relationships as derived from [4], [16] and [3]:…”
Section: B Phase Quantizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Note that whilst the maximum tolerable phase error is expressed as a path length or phase difference, where λ is the wavelength of the center frequency of the excitation pulse in the medium, it can also be represented using the following relationships as derived from [4], [16] and [3]:…”
Section: B Phase Quantizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Holm and Kristoffersen [3] combined the effect of steering with the focused case as described in [16] in order to evaluate a 'worst case' where quantization effects were most severe. It was shown that the worst case with respect to ultrasound applications would be the use of continuous wave excitation and a combination of maximum correlated error (i.e.…”
Section: B Phase Quantizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The focusing precision is of paramount importance for the image quality [4] and simple compression is not an option. Parametric recursive delay generators have been suggested for the case of image lines originating from the transducer [2], [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%