1984
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/29/11/003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of x-ray computed tomography images using the noise power spectrum and autocorrelation function

Abstract: A discrete representation of the reconstruction process, consistent with the method of data collection, has been used to derive expressions for the noise power spectrum, autocorrelation function and noise equivalent quanta (NEQ) of a computed tomography (CT) image. These parameters have been expressed in terms of basic scanning factors such as tube current, exposure time, slice width and number of detectors. Each of these factors affects the overall magnitude of the noise power spectrum, but the spatial freque… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A wealth of literature has been devoted to studying the noise characteristics of xray computed tomography (CT) in terms of the pixel variance, spatial domain covariance matrix, or Fourier domain noise-power spectrum (NPS). [1][2][3][4][5][6] Moreover, it is generally accepted that image quality should be defined with respect to the imaging task, 7,8 where detectability is calculated to account for noise, spatial resolution as well as the task function and observer model. Such task-based frameworks are increasingly employed in system design, performance assessment, and optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wealth of literature has been devoted to studying the noise characteristics of xray computed tomography (CT) in terms of the pixel variance, spatial domain covariance matrix, or Fourier domain noise-power spectrum (NPS). [1][2][3][4][5][6] Moreover, it is generally accepted that image quality should be defined with respect to the imaging task, 7,8 where detectability is calculated to account for noise, spatial resolution as well as the task function and observer model. Such task-based frameworks are increasingly employed in system design, performance assessment, and optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 An analytical formula for the NPS with a discrete reconstruction process was derived in Ref. 15, where the effects of sampling within the projection and angular sampling were considered. The effects of interpolation and noise aliasing caused by reconstruction pixel sampling were also studied in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boedeker et al [20] and Faulkner et al [21] proposed to use the NPS and the noise equivalent quanta (NEQ) to describe the noise properties in CT images, whereas Joemai et al [7] used the NPS and variance to validate their low--dose CT model. Mieville et al [22] investigated the spatial dependency and non--stationarity of the NPS.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%