2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10163-013-0187-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis on biochemical methane potential of agricultural byproducts with different types of silage storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the range of 3.6-4.0 for the excellent silage (Guan et al 2002). This was because LAB developed, leading to it became the predominant population during anaerobic phase, resulting in large amounts of organic acid (Kang et al 2014). Particularly, anthocyanin-rich PSS displayed a lower pH value, perhaps because the structure of purple corn anthocyanin was bonded to sugar (Aoki et al 2002), resulting in easy fermentation during storage in anthocyaninrich PSS relative to the control.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…the range of 3.6-4.0 for the excellent silage (Guan et al 2002). This was because LAB developed, leading to it became the predominant population during anaerobic phase, resulting in large amounts of organic acid (Kang et al 2014). Particularly, anthocyanin-rich PSS displayed a lower pH value, perhaps because the structure of purple corn anthocyanin was bonded to sugar (Aoki et al 2002), resulting in easy fermentation during storage in anthocyaninrich PSS relative to the control.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silica was the dominant constituent in the mineral fraction and most particles in the solid fraction appeared as silica coated by lignin, hampering separation of the two components before incineration or refinement of the residue. Kang and co-workers estimated biogas production by anaerobic digestion of agricultural byproduct silage from hot pepper farms [7]. Biochemical tests showed that the ultimate methane potential of ensiled material was higher than that of raw material without silage storage, with a lower firstorder hydrolysis constant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of the TS, VS, COD, and other contents was performed according to standard procedures [27]. The pH was measured using the method reported by Kang et al [28]. The pH measurement of the samples from the biogas tests was performed by shaking the sample manually, after which it was left to stand for 10 min and the supernatant reading was taken.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%