2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.07.148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis on heat transfer and pressure drop of fin-and-oval-tube heat exchangers with tear-drop delta vortex generators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, this secondary flow is noted observed with the installation of the convex strips. Meanwhile, the installation of the convex strips increases the fluid velocity in the gap between the tube and convex strips owing to the narrowing of the channel cross‐sectional area, which increases the fluid velocity 31 . The changes in the flow patterns due to the installation of four and eight convex strips can be analyzed in detail by expressing the flow field in the horizontal plane ( Y = 0.92 mm), as shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, this secondary flow is noted observed with the installation of the convex strips. Meanwhile, the installation of the convex strips increases the fluid velocity in the gap between the tube and convex strips owing to the narrowing of the channel cross‐sectional area, which increases the fluid velocity 31 . The changes in the flow patterns due to the installation of four and eight convex strips can be analyzed in detail by expressing the flow field in the horizontal plane ( Y = 0.92 mm), as shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Figure 11, it can be observed that the decrease in the longitudinal vortex on a single VG pair is caused by viscous dissipation, as the fluid flows downstream. However, the longitudinal vortex was enhanced again with the addition of VG pairs [10]. Figures 11 (a)-(c) show that the installation of seven pairs of CxDWP and CDWP increased the longitudinal vortex intensity by 36.9% and 185.23%, respectively, against DWP Re = 689 with an attack angle of 20º at x/L = 0.21.…”
Section: Longitudinal Vortex Intensitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Through three-dimensional (3D) modeling, Naik and Tiwari [9] studied the effect of winglet locations on heat transfer features in fin and tube heat exchangers using inline RWPs, and observed that the Nusselt number (Nu) and secondary flow intensity (Se) peaked at ∆Y = ± 1.25 and attack angle (β) = 45°, which are mounted in the downstream area adjacent to the tube. Lu and Zhai [10] numerically analyzed the heat transfer and pressure drop on a fin and oval tube heat exchanger using a tear-drop delta VG, found that the tear-drop delta GV outperforms plain delta VG, and investigated the mechanism of the advantage in the light of Se and field synergy principle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarangi and Mishra [21] studied the location of VGs in common flow up configuration and reported that the VGs near the central tube were effective at heat-transfer enhancement. Lu and Zhai [22] numerically studied the performance of tear-drop VGs in common flow up. They found that tear-drop VGs can enhance the heat transfer with a negligible increase in the pressure drop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%