2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2201.00492
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis on the composite nature of the light scalar mesons $f_{0}(980)$ and $a_0(980)$

Ze-Qiang Wang,
Xian-Wei Kang,
J. A. Oller
et al.

Abstract: We study the weight or compositeness of the ππ-K K and πη-K K in the composition of the f 0 (980) and a 0 (980) resonances, respectively. Either we use the saturation of the total width and compositeness, or we use a Flatté parameterization taking also into account the spectral function of a near-threshold resonance. We make connections and compare between these two methods. We take input values for the pole mass and width from several determinations in the literature. In addition, we take as third input eithe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, there is also a non-relativistic expansion for G(s) [49]. The difference between the value of dG I I /ds s=s P and its leading non-relativistic expansion is less than 5%.…”
Section: Event Number Distributionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In fact, there is also a non-relativistic expansion for G(s) [49]. The difference between the value of dG I I /ds s=s P and its leading non-relativistic expansion is less than 5%.…”
Section: Event Number Distributionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In fact, there is also a non-relativistic expansion for G(s) [47]. The difference between the value of dG II /ds s=s P and its leading non-relativistic expansion is less than 5%.…”
Section: Compositeness For a Resonancementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Additionally, the hadronic FFs of D + s → ϕµ + ν µ are extracted through a partial wave analysis (PWA) and the size of a possible f 0 (980) component in the decay D + s → K + K − µ + ν µ is limited. An f 0 (980) contribution would be interesting, in view of the unconventional nature of this state [27][28][29][30][31]. Charge conjugation is implied throughout this work.…”
Section: Jhep12(2023)072mentioning
confidence: 99%