Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
We use a near-threshold parameterization with explicit inclusion of the Castillejo–Dalitz–Dyson poles, which is more general than the effective range expansion, to study the bottomonium-like states $$Z_b(10610)$$ Z b ( 10610 ) and $$Z_b(10650)$$ Z b ( 10650 ) . In terms of the partial-wave amplitude, we fit the event number distribution of $$B^{(*)}{\bar{B}}^*$$ B ( ∗ ) B ¯ ∗ system to the experimental data for these resonances from Belle Collaboration. The data could be described very well in our method, which supports the molecular interpretation. Then the relevant physical quantities are obtained, including the $$B^{(*)}\bar{B}^*$$ B ( ∗ ) B ¯ ∗ scattering length (a), effective range (r), and residue squared ($$\gamma _s^2$$ γ s 2 ) of the pole in the complex plane. In particular, we find the compositeness can range from about 0.4 up to 1 for the $$B{\bar{B}}^*$$ B B ¯ ∗ ($$B^*{\bar{B}}^*$$ B ∗ B ¯ ∗ ) component in the resonance $$Z_b(10610)$$ Z b ( 10610 ) ($$Z_b(10650)$$ Z b ( 10650 ) ).
We use a near-threshold parameterization with explicit inclusion of the Castillejo–Dalitz–Dyson poles, which is more general than the effective range expansion, to study the bottomonium-like states $$Z_b(10610)$$ Z b ( 10610 ) and $$Z_b(10650)$$ Z b ( 10650 ) . In terms of the partial-wave amplitude, we fit the event number distribution of $$B^{(*)}{\bar{B}}^*$$ B ( ∗ ) B ¯ ∗ system to the experimental data for these resonances from Belle Collaboration. The data could be described very well in our method, which supports the molecular interpretation. Then the relevant physical quantities are obtained, including the $$B^{(*)}\bar{B}^*$$ B ( ∗ ) B ¯ ∗ scattering length (a), effective range (r), and residue squared ($$\gamma _s^2$$ γ s 2 ) of the pole in the complex plane. In particular, we find the compositeness can range from about 0.4 up to 1 for the $$B{\bar{B}}^*$$ B B ¯ ∗ ($$B^*{\bar{B}}^*$$ B ∗ B ¯ ∗ ) component in the resonance $$Z_b(10610)$$ Z b ( 10610 ) ($$Z_b(10650)$$ Z b ( 10650 ) ).
We use a near-threshold parameterization with explicit inclusion of the Castillejo-Dalitz-Dyson poles, which is more general than the effective range expansion, to study the bottomonium-like states Z b (10610) and Z b (10650). In terms of the partial-wave amplitude, we fit the event number distribution of B ( * ) B * system to the experimental data for these resonances from Belle Collaboration. The data could be described very well in our method, which supports the molecular interpretation. Then the relevant physical quantities are obtained, including the B ( * ) B * scattering length (a), effective range (r), and residue squared (γ 2 s ) of the pole in the complex plane. In particular, we find the compositeness can range from about 0.4 up to 1 for the B B * (B * B * ) component in the resonance Z b (10610) (Z b (10650)).
The $$ {D}_s^{+}\to {K}^{+}{K}^{-}{\mu}^{+}{\nu}_{\mu } $$ D s + → K + K − μ + ν μ decay is studied based on 7.33 fb−1 of e+e− collision data collected with the BESIII detector at center-of-mass energies in the range from 4.128 to 4.226 GeV. The absolute branching fraction is measured as $$ \mathcal{B}\left({D}_s^{+}\to \phi {\mu}^{+}{\nu}_{\mu}\right)=\left(2.25\pm 0.09\pm 0.07\right)\times {10}^{-2} $$ B D s + → ϕ μ + ν μ = 2.25 ± 0.09 ± 0.07 × 10 − 2 , the most precise measurement to date. Combining with the world average of $$ \mathcal{B}\left({D}_s^{+}\to \phi {e}^{+}{\nu}_e\right) $$ B D s + → ϕ e + ν e , the ratio of the branching fractions obtained is $$ \frac{\mathcal{B}\left({D}_s^{+}\to \phi {\mu}^{+}{\nu}_{\mu}\right)}{\mathcal{B}\left({D}_s^{+}\to \phi {e}^{+}{\nu}_e\right)}=0.94\pm 0.08 $$ B D s + → ϕ μ + ν μ B D s + → ϕ e + ν e = 0.94 ± 0.08 , in agreement with lepton universality. By performing a partial wave analysis, the hadronic form factor ratios at q2 = 0 are extracted, finding $$ {r}_V=\frac{V(0)}{A_1(0)}=1.58\pm 0.17\pm 0.02 $$ r V = V 0 A 1 0 = 1.58 ± 0.17 ± 0.02 and $$ {r}_2=\frac{A_2(0)}{A_1(0)}=0.71\pm 0.14\pm 0.02 $$ r 2 = A 2 0 A 1 0 = 0.71 ± 0.14 ± 0.02 , where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second are systematic. No significant S-wave contribution from f0(980) → K+K− is found. The upper limit $$ \mathcal{B}\left({D}_s^{+}\to {f}_0(980){\mu}^{+}{\nu}_{\mu}\right)\cdot \mathcal{B}\left({f}_0(980)\to {K}^{+}{K}^{-}\right)<5.45\times {10}^{-4} $$ B D s + → f 0 980 μ + ν μ ⋅ B f 0 980 → K + K − < 5.45 × 10 − 4 is set at 90% credibility level.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.