2020
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2019.2928997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis–Synthesis Learning With Shared Features: Algorithms for Histology Image Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we evaluate our proposed GS-PCANet image classification algorithm with other open-source histopathology image classification methods: SpPCANet method for image classification [46], multiple clustered instance learning (MCIL) for histopathology image classification [50], saliency-based dictionary learning (SDL) [34], analysis-synthesis learning with shared features (ASLF) [35], patch-based convolutional neural network (PCNN) [36], encoded local projections (ELP) for histopathology image classification [20], and weakly supervised deep learning (WSDL) for whole slide tissue classification [40]. We evaluate these seven methods using commonly used detection/classification measures: precision (P), recall (R), detection accuracy, F β -score, Tanimoto coefficient (T), and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves along with the area under the curve (AUC).…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section we evaluate our proposed GS-PCANet image classification algorithm with other open-source histopathology image classification methods: SpPCANet method for image classification [46], multiple clustered instance learning (MCIL) for histopathology image classification [50], saliency-based dictionary learning (SDL) [34], analysis-synthesis learning with shared features (ASLF) [35], patch-based convolutional neural network (PCNN) [36], encoded local projections (ELP) for histopathology image classification [20], and weakly supervised deep learning (WSDL) for whole slide tissue classification [40]. We evaluate these seven methods using commonly used detection/classification measures: precision (P), recall (R), detection accuracy, F β -score, Tanimoto coefficient (T), and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves along with the area under the curve (AUC).…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These features are then used to classify an image patch as cancerous or healthy using a linear SVM classifier. Our approach differs from earlier learning-based methods based on deep learning [36], [40], instance learning [20], [50] or dictionary learning [34], [35] for histopathology image classification. Like many deep learning methods, the network parameters, such as the number of stages, the filter size, and the number of filters, need to be optimized and fixed for our GS-PCANet method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach was employed in an image analysis and data mining pipeline to identify histological features capable of differentiating between cancer and non-cancer lesions and the malignant transformation-potential in gliomas (figure 2). 52 Using whole slide imaging data from the Cancer Genome Atlas and companion clinical data for these specimens, we assessed the prognostic relevance of these histological discriminants 53 54. Histopathology image-derived measurements, such as cell morphologies, spatial patterns of cellular organisation, in combination with a bag-of-words (BoW) approach53 55 was used to identify tissue subregions that have visually distinct properties (eg, nuclear morphology, patterns of spatial organisation) and were associated with time-to-malignant transformation.…”
Section: Ai and ML Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…new revenues of computational pathology. There have been some computational pathology tools that support pathologists for very routine tasks such as to segment nuclei [3]- [5] or tumour [6] and to classify cancer in histopathological images [7]- [9]. Due to the promising impact on future pathology practice, digital pathology and computational pathology have been attracting tremendous attention [10], [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%