Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Computational Linguistics - 1999
DOI: 10.3115/1034678.1034719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis system of speech acts and discourse structures using maximum entropy model

Abstract: We propose a statistical dialogue analysis model to determine discourse structures as well as speech acts using maximum entropy model. The model can automatically acquire probabilistic discourse knowledge from a discourse tagged corpus to resolve ambiguities. We propose the idea of tagging discourse segment boundaries to represent the structural information of discourse. Using this representation we can effectively combine speech act analysis and discourse structure analysis in one framework.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5. The comparison of the performances for the shrinkage technique according to the distribution of speech acts Table 7 shows results from the proposed model and previous speech acts analysis models: the maximum entropy model (MEM) [1], the decision tree model (DTM) [8], and the neural network model (NNM) [5]. We report the performance of each system when using the same test data set as that of this paper.…”
Section: Fig 4 the Performance According To Different Number Of Tramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…5. The comparison of the performances for the shrinkage technique according to the distribution of speech acts Table 7 shows results from the proposed model and previous speech acts analysis models: the maximum entropy model (MEM) [1], the decision tree model (DTM) [8], and the neural network model (NNM) [5]. We report the performance of each system when using the same test data set as that of this paper.…”
Section: Fig 4 the Performance According To Different Number Of Tramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since discourse structure information represents the relationship between two consecutive utterances, it is efficient to use discourse structure Use speech acts that pop in discourse stack and Sub-dialogue End (SE) else Use speech acts of previous utterance and Dialogue Continue (DC) End information for speech acts analysis [1]. Especially, the speech act of seventh utterance in Table 1 (UID: 7) is tied with that of second utterance (UID: 2).…”
Section: Context Features Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations