2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2010.5651625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytic collision anticipation technology considering agents' future behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much research has aimed to anticipate future intentions of other traffic agents [17]. The solutions proposed range from deterministic models [18] to different probabilistic models [19], such as Kalman Filters (KF) [20], Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBN), and Hierarchical Dynamic Bayesian Networks (HDBN) [21] or Gaussian Process (GP) regression [22]. Most statistic observers provide observation with a probability value or a probability distribution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much research has aimed to anticipate future intentions of other traffic agents [17]. The solutions proposed range from deterministic models [18] to different probabilistic models [19], such as Kalman Filters (KF) [20], Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBN), and Hierarchical Dynamic Bayesian Networks (HDBN) [21] or Gaussian Process (GP) regression [22]. Most statistic observers provide observation with a probability value or a probability distribution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is complex; it is inherently probabilistic because perfect knowledge of the future is impossible, and it requires not only a model of the dynamics of the object being anticipated, but also of the controller of that object. Some works simplify the problem by making deterministic predictions of object behavior (Choi et al., ; Ohki et al., ; Petti & Fraichard, ), and these approaches work well when the behavior of the dynamic objects is known or communicated to the robot, as in a cooperative scenario.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interesting approaches to determine the future behaviour of moving obstacles also been proposed. One of them is the definition of a discrete number of hypothesis of movement, each one related with a possible conduct of the object [5], [6], and the 3-D Triangular Collision Object (TCO) [13]. However, these methods do not contemplate the influence of the environment over the movement of the obstacles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%