2005
DOI: 10.1063/1.2011318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytic Differentiation of Barlat’s 2D Criteria for Inverse Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this inconvenient, Endelt et al [63,64] and Cooreman [62] highlighted the possibility of computing the sensitivity matrix analytically, with the latter author having concluded the inability of this approach for computing the sensitivities of strain fields to the material parameters, in mechanical tests involving complex and/or heterogeneous deformation.…”
Section: Optimization Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this inconvenient, Endelt et al [63,64] and Cooreman [62] highlighted the possibility of computing the sensitivity matrix analytically, with the latter author having concluded the inability of this approach for computing the sensitivities of strain fields to the material parameters, in mechanical tests involving complex and/or heterogeneous deformation.…”
Section: Optimization Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors proposed alternative methods for computing the sensitivities, within the context of inverse identification strategies, mainly to overcome the potentially high computational costs associated with the use of finite differences. Endelt and Nielsen (2004), Endelt et al (2005), Endelt and Danckert (2009), Cooreman (2008) and Cooreman et al (2007) explored the possibility of analytically calculating the sensitivity matrix for the inverse identification of the yield criterion and hardening law parameters. Endelt and co-authors proposed a general approach for the inverse identification of material parameters based on global measurements (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%