2006
DOI: 10.1007/11866763_78
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytic Expressions for Fiducial and Surface Target Registration Error

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between the FRE and the TRE were addressed in previous studies, and new methods were developed to obtain a better TRE estimation [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. These methods usually incorporate fiducial localization error (FLE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The differences between the FRE and the TRE were addressed in previous studies, and new methods were developed to obtain a better TRE estimation [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. These methods usually incorporate fiducial localization error (FLE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The model of fiducial registration published in [7] treated each noise-free fiducial location as an end point of a zero-length linear spring. Noise in the registered marker location was considered as a small extension of the spring.…”
Section: Spatial Stiffness Analysis For Anisotropic Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of this article, we will assume that we are working with fiducials measured in the optical tracker coordinate system so that the noise covariance matrix for the marker locations is diagonal. Our derivation of the anisotropic stiffness matrix follows that of [7]. Let the j th fi-…”
Section: Spatial Stiffness Analysis For Anisotropic Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations