2005
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450830609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytic Expressions of Ultimate Gains and Ultimate Periods with Phase‐Optimal Approximations of Time Delays

Abstract: R&D NOTET here are many tuning rules currently available for PI/PID controllers (Astrom and Hagglund, 1988;Seborg et al., 1989;O'Dwyer, 2003) and new tuning rules (e.g. Zhang et al., 2002) are still being reported. Among them, tuning rules based on ultimate gains and ultimate periods (Ziegler and Nichols, 1942;Zhuang and Atherton, 1993) have several advantages over tuning rules based on specific process models. For example, tuning rules based on the first order plus time delay model cannot be applied directly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The angular frequency of Eq. becomes the ultimate frequency of process G(s)=exp(2θHs)/(τHs+1) and its approximate solution can be obtained as ω90=π81+1+8θH/(πτH)θH …”
Section: Pi Controller For the Hoptd Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The angular frequency of Eq. becomes the ultimate frequency of process G(s)=exp(2θHs)/(τHs+1) and its approximate solution can be obtained as ω90=π81+1+8θH/(πτH)θH …”
Section: Pi Controller For the Hoptd Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%