Analytic Hierarchy process selection for batteries storage technologies

Ammar, Faouzi Ben; Hafsa, Ines Hammami; Hammami, Faten

doi:10.1109/iceesa.2013.6578374

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Subsequently, from the criteria presented in Figure 6, their application in batteries was evaluated for electric vehicles aimed at different applications (economy or performance) using the Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT). That was the chosen method as this paper looks to provide a more transparent and intuitive decision-making process for the reader, being more direct and straightforward than others such as ELECTRE III and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the latter of which has already been used in the context of material research for electric vehicle batteries (Ben Ammar, Hafsa and Hammami, 2013).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparative study of different battery geometries used in electric vehicles

Hummes,

Hunt,

Hervé

et al. 2023

Lat. Am. J. Energy Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper contributes with a review of current and future electric vehicle battery geometries, as there are few comparisons regarding performance criteria in the literature. With these considerations, this paper seeks to fill this gap by comparing commercial batteries with different geometries. First, the specifications of each battery (found on manufacturers' websites or in specialized media) are presented. Then, the battery evaluation criteria are defined considering two distinct applications: economy and performance cars, using the Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) method. From that analysis, the blade battery presented the best overall performance with a good rating for both applications. The cylindrical geometry followed with a rating suited better for performance vehicles, and the pouch geometry followed showing promise for use in economy-driven vehicles mostly. Lastly, a case study is carried out by evaluating the application of each of the batteries in a commercial vehicle. It was found that when compared to new technologies, the potential for improvement on any of the studied criteria is enormous. In particular, the Licerion pouch battery (Sion) showed the best performance regarding range and capacity-to-weight ratio, while the 4680 cylindrical battery (Panasonic) and blade battery (BYD) were superior in capacity-to-volume and capacity-to-cost ratios, respectively.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparative study of different battery geometries used in electric vehicles

Hummes,

Hunt,

Hervé

et al. 2023

Lat. Am. J. Energy Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The preliminary evaluation of the tested batteries is based on analysis of technical data provided by the manufacturers. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) [28], [29], [30] is used to determine the optimal battery cell based on the criteria available in all manufacturers' data: declared energy capacity, maximum discharge current, maximum charge current and price.…”

Section: B Preliminary Evaluation Of the Tested Batteriesmentioning

confidence: 99%