2004
DOI: 10.1002/cpa.20053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytic methods for obstruction to integrability in discrete dynamical systems

Abstract: A unique analytic continuation result is proved for solutions of a relatively general class of difference equations, using techniques of generalized Borel summability.This continuation allows for Painlevé property methods to be extended to difference equations.It is shown that the Painlevé property (PP) induces, under relatively general assumptions, a dichotomy within first order difference equations: all equations with PP can be solved in closed form; on the contrary, absence of PP implies, under some further… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Altogether we have 8) and since R n is bounded from below by p(n, ∅) which tends to 1, the proof is complete.…”
Section: The Delocalized Phasementioning
confidence: 65%
“…Altogether we have 8) and since R n is bounded from below by p(n, ∅) which tends to 1, the proof is complete.…”
Section: The Delocalized Phasementioning
confidence: 65%
“…To go beyond Proposition 1.2 we restrict to the d = 2 case. This restriction is made because we want to exploit directly the results in [4,5,6], that develop only the case d = 2. It is certainly possible to generalize these works, but this would not add much to the purpose of this note at the expense of rather lengthy arguments.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is beyond the scope here, and will be the subject of a different paper. A less explicit expression has been obtained in [5]. We note that the constant log 2 (2π) in (1.17) of [5] should be (2π)/ log 2. where g ′ (ξ) ∼ ax θ .…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A less explicit expression has been obtained in [5]. We note that the constant log 2 (2π) in (1.17) of [5] should be (2π)/ log 2. where g ′ (ξ) ∼ ax θ . Now θ is fixed and m is arbitrary, and then the result follows.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation