2018
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2018.90
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytic model of a resistive magnetohydrodynamic shock without Hall effect

Abstract: An analytic model of a stationary hypersonic magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) shock with an externally applied magnetic field is proposed. Basically, original jump conditions at a plane oblique shock, analogous to the Rankine–Hugoniot formulae, with a moderately resistive air plasma downstream are derived. Viscous, thermal and Hall effects are neglected, but the plasma dissociation behind the shock causing a jump of isentropic exponent is also a major input of the model. Then, a shock-fitting procedure with ambient a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Hall MHD has become a part of astrophysical magnetohydrodynamics in its own [22], because the Hall effect is likely to develop in most of magnetized celestial bodies, and to impact MHD processes, including turbulence [27], dynamo [29], star formation [7] and magnetic reconnection [15]. The main difference between both situations is that, as pointed out in our previous work by considering the magnetic Reynolds number [3], the magnetic field does not evolve in our problem, while it is strongly flow-dependent in geophysical and astrophysical situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…More recently, Hall MHD has become a part of astrophysical magnetohydrodynamics in its own [22], because the Hall effect is likely to develop in most of magnetized celestial bodies, and to impact MHD processes, including turbulence [27], dynamo [29], star formation [7] and magnetic reconnection [15]. The main difference between both situations is that, as pointed out in our previous work by considering the magnetic Reynolds number [3], the magnetic field does not evolve in our problem, while it is strongly flow-dependent in geophysical and astrophysical situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…( ) ( ) In addition, following other authors [36][39], in order to be consistent with our previous approach [3], we assume a power-law relationship between the ordinary electrical conductivity σ e and the temperature T:…”
Section: Jump Relations 21 Basic Differential Equationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effects of a magnetic field on the three-dimensional flow of a nanofluid having a suspension of ferrous nanoparticles within the framework of a non-uniformly thickened sheet in a slip flow regime has been analysed [16]. An analytical model of a stationary hypersonic MHD shock with an externally applied magnetic field has also been proposed [17]. Decaying homogeneous and isotropic MHD turbulence has been investigated numerically at large Reynolds numbers [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%