Analytic models in strategy, organizations, and management research: A guide for consumers

Abstract

Research summary Analytic models are a powerful approach for developing theory, yet are often poorly understood in the strategy and organizations community. Our goal is to enhance the influence of the method by clarifying for consumers of modeling research how to understand and appreciate analytic modeling and use modeling results to enhance their own research. Our primary contribution is a guide for reading analytic models. Using comparisons with other methods and exemplar analytic models, we explore key features as well as counterintuitive aspects and common misconceptions. We also add by illuminating strengths and weaknesses of analytic modeling relative to other theory‐building methods. Finally, we identify under‐exploited opportunities for pairing analytic models with complementary methods. Overall, our aim is enhancing the influence of analytic modeling by better‐informing consumers. Managerial summary In this paper, we explore the use of analytic (mathematical) models for developing strategy and organizations theory. Analytic modeling is common in related fields like economics but is often poorly understood among the broader of strategy and organizations community. Whereas existing resources on analytic modeling are geared towards modelers, our aim is to enhance understanding and appreciation of the method among potential consumers of modeling research. We offer three specific contributions in this regard. The first is a guide for reading analytic models, including key features, counterintuitive aspects, and common misconceptions. Second, we clarify the strengths and weaknesses of analytic modeling relative to other theory‐building methods. Finally, we discuss promising opportunities for pairing methods.

Exploring Critical Success Factors of Competence-Based Synergy in Strategic Alliances: The Renault–Nissan–Mitsubishi Strategic Alliance

“…Recently, (Hannah et al 2021) argued that mathematical models for developing strategy are often poorly understood in the strategic management and organizational community (Hannah et al 2021, p. 329). "... Strategy scholars are now building theory using an option-pricing model that is solved numerically ..., while powerful closed-form approaches exist in the finance literature that has yet to be adopted in the strategy... A new approach may allow new research questions to be asked, and existing questions to be addressed in greater depth" (Hannah et al 2021, p. 353).…”

“…This is the major theoretical contribution. The current paper has addressed this gap by contributing an understanding of option pricing models to value a competence-based synergy of collaborative strategy and making them more accessible and compelling to the broad strategy and finance scholarly community (Hannah et al 2021).…”

What is the Eisenhardt Method, really?

“…The view here is a modeling one that defines accuracy by a theory's fit with the essence (i.e. core features) of the phenomenon, not every detail (Hannah et al, 2020), a view relevant for multiple cases. 4.…”

COVID-19 Outbreak and Health literacy of Health Institutions: The Role of Strategic Theory

“…Since the creation of new knowledge depends on existing capabilities and corporate regulations, the organization's knowledge develops in a path-dependent manner through the iteration and recombination of existing knowledge. In contrast, it can form the basis of strategic theory (15) .…”