2017
DOI: 10.1142/s0219024917500340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ANALYTIC PRICING OF CoCo BONDS

Abstract: We present a new model for pricing contingent convertible (CoCo) bonds which facilitates the calculation of equity, credit and interest rate risk sensitivities. We assume a lognormal equity process and a Hull–White (normal) short rate process for the conversion intensity with a downward jump in the equity price on conversion. We are able to derive an approximate solution in closed form based on the assumption that the conversion intensity volatility is asymptotically small. The simple first-order approximation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Promising research has been carried out on their valuation (Abed Masror Khah et al, 2019;Barucci & Del Viva, 2012;Chang & Yu, 2018;Chen et al, 2017;Chung & Kwok, 2016;Corcuera et al, 2014;Davis et al, 2014;de Spiegeleer et al, 2017;Leung & Kwok, 2017;Pennacchi & Tchistyi, 2019aPennacchi et al, 2014;Turfus & Shubert, 2017). However, theoretical contingent claim models, which are typically based on firm value (structural approach), credit default swaps (credit derivative approach), or dynamic replication with shares (equity derivative approach), often have difficulties taking contextual parameters into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Promising research has been carried out on their valuation (Abed Masror Khah et al, 2019;Barucci & Del Viva, 2012;Chang & Yu, 2018;Chen et al, 2017;Chung & Kwok, 2016;Corcuera et al, 2014;Davis et al, 2014;de Spiegeleer et al, 2017;Leung & Kwok, 2017;Pennacchi & Tchistyi, 2019aPennacchi et al, 2014;Turfus & Shubert, 2017). However, theoretical contingent claim models, which are typically based on firm value (structural approach), credit default swaps (credit derivative approach), or dynamic replication with shares (equity derivative approach), often have difficulties taking contextual parameters into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%