2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-021-09771-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytic Process and Linguistic Style: Exploring Analysts’ Treatment Notes in the Light of Linguistic Measures of the Referential Process

Abstract: This paper presents a comparison between a clinical evaluation and a computerized linguistic analysis of the treatment notes of the first two years of an analysis conducted four sessions a week with the patient lying on a couch. Clinical notes had been written as part of the analyst’s standard practice after every session, some years prior to the planning of this study. The notes describe the analytic interchange and the analyst’s internal thoughts. The linguistic analysis focuses on two analytically relevant … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was also an interesting pattern in which MDers often described a contrast between themselves and others using “I” and “they” or I/they verb conjugations as in, for example, “I do good things but they always do something to destroy that.” The participants from the MD group produced daydreaming descriptions with higher word counts, suggesting perhaps that they were more invested in the writing process and so more detailed dreams emerged. Similarly, the MD group used more Abstract/Reflection words, which are associated with intellectualized process as a defense mechanism [ 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 ]. Sensory-somatic words, which describe bodily symptoms, were also higher in the MD group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was also an interesting pattern in which MDers often described a contrast between themselves and others using “I” and “they” or I/they verb conjugations as in, for example, “I do good things but they always do something to destroy that.” The participants from the MD group produced daydreaming descriptions with higher word counts, suggesting perhaps that they were more invested in the writing process and so more detailed dreams emerged. Similarly, the MD group used more Abstract/Reflection words, which are associated with intellectualized process as a defense mechanism [ 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 ]. Sensory-somatic words, which describe bodily symptoms, were also higher in the MD group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lo Verde and colleagues (2012), focusing on the trend of IWRAD_IREF covariation, highlighted an overall decreasing trend which was consistent with results gained in the same case study by the therapeutic cycle model (Mergenthaler, 1996). Lastly, Mariani and Hoffman (2021), studying a long-term psychotherapy course, found that a negative IREF_IWRAD covariation and its overall decreasing trend-i.e., the alternation of high emotional immersion with logical, abstract language-could be adopted as an index of the success of a therapeutic/analytic process.…”
Section: Patient's Processes Of Affects Elaborationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In the literature, the IREF dictionary showed abstract and intellectualized emotional defense processes [ 38 ]. In fact, in the psychotherapeutic process, a higher index of the abstract-reflection dictionary (IREF) in the therapists’ notes pointed to a defense mechanism of the intellectualizing of the therapist regarding the psychotherapeutic relationship [ 39 , 40 ]. The same results have been found in expressive writings during the COVID-19 pandemic: this index is strictly related to people who have more infected friends and relatives [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%