2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00039-020-00536-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytic torsion and Reidemeister torsion of hyperbolic manifolds with cusps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a forthcoming paper, Theorem 1.2 will be used to generalize the main result of [21] by Lück and Schick, in which we will show the equality of Ray-Singer analytic 𝐿 2 -torsion and topological 𝐿 2 -torsion for a large class of flat, unimodular bundles over finite-volume, hyperbolic manifolds, which are studied by several other authors as well [1,4,27,28].…”
Section: Topmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In a forthcoming paper, Theorem 1.2 will be used to generalize the main result of [21] by Lück and Schick, in which we will show the equality of Ray-Singer analytic 𝐿 2 -torsion and topological 𝐿 2 -torsion for a large class of flat, unimodular bundles over finite-volume, hyperbolic manifolds, which are studied by several other authors as well [1,4,27,28].…”
Section: Topmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The Ray-Singer conjecture was proved true independently by Cheeger [15] and Müller [54]. Since then analytic torsion has found several applications in diverse areas such as the study of the growth of torsion homology of arithmetic groups [6], locally symmetric spaces [39,40,49,55] and mathematical physics [8,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coincidentally, Müller and Rochon recently studied the non-L 2 version of Theorem A for representations ρ of G that are not fixed by the standard Cartan involution on G corresponding to K < G [19]. In contrast to the L 2 -case, they showed that the two resulting torsion elements differ by a term related to the cusps of Γ\ H n = M which contribute non-trivially to the twisted cohomology H * (M, Γ\E ρ ) [19,Theorem 1.1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coincidentally, Müller and Rochon recently studied the non-L 2 version of Theorem A for representations ρ of G that are not fixed by the standard Cartan involution on G corresponding to K < G [19]. In contrast to the L 2 -case, they showed that the two resulting torsion elements differ by a term related to the cusps of Γ\ H n = M which contribute non-trivially to the twisted cohomology H * (M, Γ\E ρ ) [19,Theorem 1.1]. In fact, the situation they face (and, consequently, the method they employ) is fundamentally different from ours, the main difference being that the bundle E ρ ↓ H n central to our investigation is homogeneous (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%