2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)31081-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical and Experimental Modelling for Gain-Scheduling of a Double Scara Robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On one hand, subspace methods for the identification of LPV state space models such as the ones in [10] [13], [14] has the advantage of being much closer to the actual practice of system identification but suffers from the numerical drawbacks associated with the adoption of a fixed (generally not well conditioned) basis for the manipulation of state space models.…”
Section: E Comments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, subspace methods for the identification of LPV state space models such as the ones in [10] [13], [14] has the advantage of being much closer to the actual practice of system identification but suffers from the numerical drawbacks associated with the adoption of a fixed (generally not well conditioned) basis for the manipulation of state space models.…”
Section: E Comments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption may not be a reasonable one in many applications, in which it would be desirable to try and derive a parameter-dependent model on the basis of local experiments only, i.e., experiments in which the scheduling variable is held constant and only the control input is excited. Such a viewpoint has been considered in [43,34,23], where numerical procedures for the construction of parametric models for gain scheduling on the basis of local experiments and for the interpolation of local controllers have been proposed.…”
Section: Automatic Derivation Of Lft Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than using a specific non-linear model, a more generic linear parameter-varying (LPV) model can be considered (see, e.g., [37]). The development of LPV model identification for the experimental modeling of robots is advocated for two main reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By construction, these techniques are restricted to specific systems where the components of the scheduling variables κ κ ∈ ⊂   n κ are totally controllable and excitable (and not only measurable). On the other hand, other methods are based on a multi-step procedure (see, e.g., [37,12]) where 1. a finite set of scheduling variable values {κ i }, i = {1, ···, N op }, is handled, 2. local experiments (corresponding to almost constant scheduling variable values) are carried out for each κ i , i = {1, ···, N op } 3. local LTI models are estimated from the sets of local I/O measurements, for each κ i , 4. a global κ-dependent model is built from the interpolation of the local LTI models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation