2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(00)00835-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical applications of membrane extraction in chromatography and electrophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In facilitated and active diffusion, a carrier is placed in the membrane to increase the membrane permeability and therefore facilitate the diffusion of the analyte. Nevertheless, in facilitated diffusion, the analyte diffuses from high to low concentration gradients while, in active diffusion, the analyte diffuses against the gradient through a reaction that occurs inside the membrane (22).…”
Section: Membrane-based Separationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In facilitated and active diffusion, a carrier is placed in the membrane to increase the membrane permeability and therefore facilitate the diffusion of the analyte. Nevertheless, in facilitated diffusion, the analyte diffuses from high to low concentration gradients while, in active diffusion, the analyte diffuses against the gradient through a reaction that occurs inside the membrane (22).…”
Section: Membrane-based Separationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of CE, especially for the trace analysis, is usually restricted due to the relatively low concentration sensitivity because of the small sampling volume and short optical path length of detection window. Therefore, several methods, including sweeping 77, field‐amplified sample stacking 78, 79, transient isotachophoresis 80, 81, dynamic pH junction 82, 83, SPE 84, 85, membrane extraction 86, and supercritical fluid extraction 87, have been used to enhance the sensitivity of CE. SPE is one of the most intensively used pre‐concentration methods in many fields 88–90, where a high extraction recovery of many compounds can usually be obtained if the sorbent and operating procedure are suitable.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Varesio and Veuthey [145] reported a high number of interfering compounds when ultrafiltration was used for the enantioselective analysis of amphetamine and analogs in urine. Nonporous membrane-based extraction techniques are efficient alternatives to classical sample preparation procedures [146][147][148][149]. They are characterized by a high degree of selectivity and enrichment power, being particularly attractive for bioanalysis purposes.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%