2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Assessment of Renewable Energy Sources and Energy Storage Concerning their Merits for the Electric Power System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Renewable energy heating, an input-output production system involving exploration, development, operation and consumption, inevitably needs to be judged by multi-dimensional criteria (Zhang et al, 2019). Due to different research focuses, scholars have evaluated different types of RE performance from different perspectives, including economic performance (Korsavi et al, 2018;Lehr et al, 2012), energy performance (Dong and Shi, 2019;Raugei and Leccisi, 2016), environmental performance (Adams and Acheampong, 2019;Dogan and Seker, 2016), technology performance (Henninger et al, 2017), and policy performance (Matsumoto et al, 2017;Pérez de Arce et al, 2016). Some studies have also assessed multiple performances of RE by using different methods (Amer and Daim, 2011;Atmaca and Basar, 2012).…”
Section: Framework Of Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Renewable energy heating, an input-output production system involving exploration, development, operation and consumption, inevitably needs to be judged by multi-dimensional criteria (Zhang et al, 2019). Due to different research focuses, scholars have evaluated different types of RE performance from different perspectives, including economic performance (Korsavi et al, 2018;Lehr et al, 2012), energy performance (Dong and Shi, 2019;Raugei and Leccisi, 2016), environmental performance (Adams and Acheampong, 2019;Dogan and Seker, 2016), technology performance (Henninger et al, 2017), and policy performance (Matsumoto et al, 2017;Pérez de Arce et al, 2016). Some studies have also assessed multiple performances of RE by using different methods (Amer and Daim, 2011;Atmaca and Basar, 2012).…”
Section: Framework Of Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes various MCDM tools applied in the planning of processes based on energy [17,18], water resource management [19], material selection techniques [20,21], and machine applications [22] with the ranking of different renewable power systems [23]. GIS-based selection for solar power site suitability [24], use of AHP for micro-grid source selection [25], implementation of solar plant through MCDM [26], integrated approach using GIS-MCDM for optimal selection of hydropower location [27], fuzzy-MULTIMOORA approach for energy storage technologies [28], use of MCDM in renewable energy project [29,30] are some of the relevant literatures. The growth of RE share in total energy production is slow, but RE is certainly becoming a significant alternative worldwide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%