2020
DOI: 10.11613/bm.2020.030701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical bias of automated immunoassays for six serum steroid hormones assessed by LC-MS/MS

Abstract: Introduction: There is a growing amount of evidence showing the significant analytical bias of steroid hormone immunoassays, but large number of available immunoassays makes conduction of a single comprehensive study of this issue hardly feasible. Aim of this study was to assess the analytical bias of six heterogeneous immunoassays for serum aldosterone, cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS), testosterone, 17-hydroxyprogesterone (OHP) and progesterone using the liquid chromatography coupled to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limited agreement in aldosterone results between CLIA and LCSMS is evident. Whilst this poor correlation has been previously established ( 25 , 26 , 27 ), and we have noted a similar degree of discordance in our own laboratory in samples taken from patients without COVID-19 (unpublished data), the effect in COVID-19 patients is exaggerated. Solvent extraction significantly improves the correlation between methods suggesting a water-soluble metabolite may be cross-reacting in the direct immunoassay; this has also been previously demonstrated using extraction immunoassay ( 15 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The limited agreement in aldosterone results between CLIA and LCSMS is evident. Whilst this poor correlation has been previously established ( 25 , 26 , 27 ), and we have noted a similar degree of discordance in our own laboratory in samples taken from patients without COVID-19 (unpublished data), the effect in COVID-19 patients is exaggerated. Solvent extraction significantly improves the correlation between methods suggesting a water-soluble metabolite may be cross-reacting in the direct immunoassay; this has also been previously demonstrated using extraction immunoassay ( 15 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The limited agreement in aldosterone results between CLIA and LCSMS is evident. Whilst this poor correlation has been previously established [25][26][27],…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The limited agreement in aldosterone results between CLIA and LCSMS is evident. Whilst this poor correlation has been previously established [24, 25], the effect in COVID-19 patients is exaggerated. Solvent extraction significantly improves the correlation between methods suggesting a water soluble metabolite may be cross reacting in the direct immunoassay; this has also been previously demonstrated using extraction immunoassay [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…On the other hand, in our study LC–MS/MS was used. LC–MS/MS has some advantages over the immunoassays used in earlier studies: thanks to the chromatographic separation and selectivity of mass spectrometry, LC–MS/MS is not so prone to interferences produced by the related compounds that may exist in maternal serum 27,28 . Significant analytical bias was detected for a number of different steroid hormone concentrations, including DHEA‐S, assessed by immunoassays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%