2016
DOI: 10.1088/0741-3335/58/4/045013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical calculations for impurity seeded partially detached divertor conditions

Abstract: A simple analytical formula for the impurity seeded partially detached divertor operational point has been developed using 1D modelling. The inclusion of charge exchange momentum loss terms improves the 1D modelling for ASDEX Upgrade conditions and its extrapolation to larger devices. The investigations are concentrated around a partially detached divertor working point of low heat flux and an electron temperature around 2.5 eV at the target which are required to maintain low sputtering rates at a tungsten tar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
71
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1,2] Experiments on impurity seeding using different gases (mainly N, Ne, and Ar, more rare Kr) are performed on many machines for several years, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and they are supported by analytical models and numerical modelling. [13][14][15][16][17] It is widely accepted that as the impurty seeding rate increases, target operation regime moves from the attachment (strong heat flux density peak near the strike point) through the partial detachment (notable reduction of the heat flux density in the strike point vicinity), the pronounced detachment (notable decrease of maximal heat flux density and maximal electron temperature in the far scrape-off layer [SOL]) to the full detachment (flattening of heat flux density and electron temperature along whole target with typical values below 1 MW∕m 2 and 2 eV correspondingly). [5] The disadvantage of intensive impurity seeding is the possible impurity leakage from the divertor, which leads to the impurity penetration into the confined region and to the fuel dilution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2] Experiments on impurity seeding using different gases (mainly N, Ne, and Ar, more rare Kr) are performed on many machines for several years, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and they are supported by analytical models and numerical modelling. [13][14][15][16][17] It is widely accepted that as the impurty seeding rate increases, target operation regime moves from the attachment (strong heat flux density peak near the strike point) through the partial detachment (notable reduction of the heat flux density in the strike point vicinity), the pronounced detachment (notable decrease of maximal heat flux density and maximal electron temperature in the far scrape-off layer [SOL]) to the full detachment (flattening of heat flux density and electron temperature along whole target with typical values below 1 MW∕m 2 and 2 eV correspondingly). [5] The disadvantage of intensive impurity seeding is the possible impurity leakage from the divertor, which leads to the impurity penetration into the confined region and to the fuel dilution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While SOLPS-ITER simulations provide state-of-the-art predictions for the exhaust performances of the various divertor configurations, the predictions are sufficiently non-linear that is typically challenging to infer unambiguous causalities, dependencies, and conclusions about the obtained solutions. To address the need for a tractable and easily inferable model, several reduced models have been developed for predicting and analyzing the scrape-off layer (SOL) and divertor performance [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Most of these follow the Lengyel model [11], which uses simplifying assumptions about SOL transport to relate the SOL impurity density, upstream electron density, and the upstream SOL heat flux to the dissipated power and onset of detached conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to reveal a scenario with the reasonable heat-flux on the target plates. The plasma detachment state is considered to be an efficient way to control the heat load on the target plate [1][2][3][4][5]. As a consequence, it is also necessary to understand fully the processes of plasma detachment in fusion devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%