Applications of Microdialysis in Pharmaceutical Science 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781118011294.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Considerations for Microdialysis Sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 218 publications
(227 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since it is generally assumed that the mass transfer resistance is primarily resulting from the resistance implied by the membrane , simplification leads to: Rm>>Re,pR=Rm=21.6 min /μnormalL…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is generally assumed that the mass transfer resistance is primarily resulting from the resistance implied by the membrane , simplification leads to: Rm>>Re,pR=Rm=21.6 min /μnormalL…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are four main methods for microdialysis probe calibration: 1) determining recovery in vitro and assuming that it is the same in vivo , 2) delivering an internal standard in the perfusate and accounting for its loss [55-57], 3) using the no-net-flux and dynamic no-net-flux methods [58-61], and 4) employing ultra-low flow rates (~0.1 μL/min) [54] or the MetaQuant probe [49,62] and assuming 100% recovery. For addition information on these methods, the reader is directed to excellent reviews on the topic [52,63]. …”
Section: Microdialysis Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%