2015
DOI: 10.2516/ogst/2014054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Estimation of Water-Oil Relative Permeabilities through Fractures

Abstract: -Modeling multiphase flow through fractures is a key issue for understanding flow mechanism and performance prediction of fractured petroleum reservoirs, geothermal reservoirs, underground aquifers and carbon-dioxide sequestration. One of the most challenging subjects in modeling of fractured petroleum reservoirs is quantifying fluids competition for flow in fracture network (relative permeability curves). Unfortunately, there is no standard technique for experimental measurement of relative permeabilities thr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calibration of the densitometer was performed following a modification of the Lagourette et al [56] method, in an analogous way to that described by Comuñas et al [57] [58]. For the liquid phase, the uncertainty in density of this EoS is 0.0001% at 0.1 MPa, and 0.003% at pressures in the interval from (10 to 100) MPa and temperatures up to 423 K. Thus, following Lagourette's method and the Comuñas' proposal, the densities were obtained according to equation (1). Density measurements were performed in the range of pressures from (27.6 to 68.9) MPa and at (333.15 and 353.15) K. Considering the propagation error law, the combined expanded uncertainty U c (k = 2) for density measurements of all systems evaluated in this study is U c (q) = 0.33 kg m À3 :…”
Section: Density Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calibration of the densitometer was performed following a modification of the Lagourette et al [56] method, in an analogous way to that described by Comuñas et al [57] [58]. For the liquid phase, the uncertainty in density of this EoS is 0.0001% at 0.1 MPa, and 0.003% at pressures in the interval from (10 to 100) MPa and temperatures up to 423 K. Thus, following Lagourette's method and the Comuñas' proposal, the densities were obtained according to equation (1). Density measurements were performed in the range of pressures from (27.6 to 68.9) MPa and at (333.15 and 353.15) K. Considering the propagation error law, the combined expanded uncertainty U c (k = 2) for density measurements of all systems evaluated in this study is U c (q) = 0.33 kg m À3 :…”
Section: Density Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design and development of these processes require detailed knowledge of thermodynamic and transport properties of reservoir fluids. For instance, for reservoir simulation, it is essential to predict the viscosity of each phase as a function of temperature and pressure to model the fluid flow [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Oil recovery is predominantly influenced by the capillary number, which characterizes the ratio of viscous forces to surface or interfacial tension forces [8,9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further elucidate the validity of the new model and highlight its advantages, the model was analyzed in comparison with existing theoretical models ,,, based on the experimental data of Chen As shown in Figure , the predictive ability of different models is studied based on the correlation between K rw and K rn . It indicates that the prediction curves are in the concentration region of the experimental data, and the proposed prediction curve fits well with the experimental data.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%