47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference<BR&amp;gt; 14th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adap 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-2164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical-Experimental Study on Using Different Control Surfaces to Alleviate Dynamic Loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the maximum amplitude φ achieved in each study is plotted against the wind velocity u ∞ . Larger amplitudes could only be achieved by using an open jet wind tunnel (Ricci and Scotti 2008;Lancelot et al 2017;Kuzmina et al 2006;Saddington et al 2015). Since the fluid dynamic fundamentals are different in open jet wind tunnel, these studies are not included in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the maximum amplitude φ achieved in each study is plotted against the wind velocity u ∞ . Larger amplitudes could only be achieved by using an open jet wind tunnel (Ricci and Scotti 2008;Lancelot et al 2017;Kuzmina et al 2006;Saddington et al 2015). Since the fluid dynamic fundamentals are different in open jet wind tunnel, these studies are not included in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of existing gust generators installed around the world is given in [18]. Most gust generators are based on one or multiple pitching airfoils [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]; however, alternative solutions exist. In 1981 Reed [30] built a gust generator for the Transonic Dynamic Tunnel using small pitching surfaces mounted on the sidewall of the tunnel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research Institute/University Year Top speed Wind tunnel cross section NASA (USA) [12] 1966 30.5 m/s Rectangular 0.6 m × 0.9 m NASA (USA) [13] 1969 76.2 m/s Rectangular 2.13 m × 3.05 m MIT (USA) [86] 1974 37 m/s Elliptical 2.13 m × 3.32 m Duke University (USA) [18] 1996 25m/s Rectangular 0.7 m × 0.53 m Virginia Tech (USA) [77] 2004 15 m/s Square 2.15 m × 2.15 m TSAGI (Russia) [78] 2005 30 m/s Elliptical 4.0 m × 2.33 m TSAGI (Russia) [78] 2005 120 m/s Circular 7 m diameter University of Maryland (USA) [87] 2008 N/A N/A Politecnico di Milano (Italy) [79] 2008 30 m/s Rectangular 1.0 m × 1.5 m University of Colorado (USA) [88] 2009 20 m/s Square 0.34 m × 0.34 m DLR (Germany) [16] 2010 Mach 0.75 Square 1.0 m × 1.0 m ONERA (France) [80] 2011 Mach 0.73 Rectangular 0.76 m × 0.8 m Cranfield University (England) [81] 2015 14.5 m/s Elliptical 1.52 m ×1.14 m ARA (England) [19] 2015 Mach 0. [83] 2019 25 m/s Square 0.9 m × 0.9 m Michigan State University (USA) [84] 2021 10 m/s Square 0.61 m × 0.61 m Mitsui engineering (Japan) [85] N/A 20 m/s N/A Example of conventional gust generators (a, directly adapted from [14]; b, directly adapted from [15]; c, directly adapted from [16])…”
Section: Generation Of Gusts In the Wind Tunnelmentioning
confidence: 99%