1998
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-998-0364-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical/Finite-element modeling and experimental verification of spray-cooling process in steel

Abstract: An atomizer is a helpful tool that can be used to tailor the cooling rate of steel from the processing temperature in order to get desired properties. It is important to determine the temperature distribution in a specimen subjected to cooling by an atomized spray. A finite-element model for transient heat transfer and thermal-stress analysis is developed to determine the temperature and thermal-stress distribution. The results of the finite-element heat-transfer model are compared with a finite-difference mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where t s and t c are the thickness of substrate and coating, respectively; K s the thermal conductivity of a given substrate, which was pre-measured, using the same method above, as 44 W/m•K and 46 W/m•K for AISI 4140 alloy steel and compacted graphite iron, respectively. These values are in Journal Pre-proof J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f good agreement with reported data [32,33]. It is worth pointing out that the uncertainty of the system was estimated to be 9%, which mainly arose from possible cross-sectional area mismatching or misalignment between the stainless steel bars and test sample, non-uniformity of coating thickness, reliability of temperature measurement, and non-uniform heat flux.…”
Section: Journalsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…where t s and t c are the thickness of substrate and coating, respectively; K s the thermal conductivity of a given substrate, which was pre-measured, using the same method above, as 44 W/m•K and 46 W/m•K for AISI 4140 alloy steel and compacted graphite iron, respectively. These values are in Journal Pre-proof J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f good agreement with reported data [32,33]. It is worth pointing out that the uncertainty of the system was estimated to be 9%, which mainly arose from possible cross-sectional area mismatching or misalignment between the stainless steel bars and test sample, non-uniformity of coating thickness, reliability of temperature measurement, and non-uniform heat flux.…”
Section: Journalsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Experimental investigations showed the following expression 12 t~F tot |N 2I(Hz25) tan (a=2)|0 : 6127 (5) where t is the spray depth, F tot is the total spray force, I …”
Section: Spray Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spray depth (thickness) of a descaling nozzle depends on spray pressure, flowrate, vertical height, inclination angle and spray angle. Experimental investigations showed the following expression 12 t~F tot |N 2I(Hz25) tan (a=2)|0 : 6127 (5) where t is the spray depth, F tot is the total spray force, I is the spray impact, H is the vertical spray height, a is a calculated spray angle (depending on the spray pressure and flowrate) and N is a constant depending on the nominal spray angle and inclination angle. To find out the values of a and N, the following procedure was introduced.…”
Section: Spray Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4,5) Nevertheless, less systematic work has been published on modeling of HP hydraulic descaling using flat spray nozzles. Previous studies have been done to determine the mechanisms of scale removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%