2014
DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Interference in Serum Iron Determination Reveals Iron Versus Gadolinium Transmetallation With Linear Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents

Abstract: Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…36,37 The interference observed in the measurement of serum calcium by the linear GBCAs was demonstrated to be due to transmetallation, which was subsequently reported as well in the colorimetric measurement of serum iron. 37,38 Despite the recommendation in the 1995 publication that colorimetric kits should not be used for determination of serum calcium in blood within 24 hours after gadodiamide injection, in the United States other analytical methods were generally not employed. This led eventually to a report in 2003 documenting inappropriate intravenous calcium administration in 7 patients, due to the incorrect diagnosis of critical hypocalcemia from blood samples obtained soon after gadodiamide injection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…36,37 The interference observed in the measurement of serum calcium by the linear GBCAs was demonstrated to be due to transmetallation, which was subsequently reported as well in the colorimetric measurement of serum iron. 37,38 Despite the recommendation in the 1995 publication that colorimetric kits should not be used for determination of serum calcium in blood within 24 hours after gadodiamide injection, in the United States other analytical methods were generally not employed. This led eventually to a report in 2003 documenting inappropriate intravenous calcium administration in 7 patients, due to the incorrect diagnosis of critical hypocalcemia from blood samples obtained soon after gadodiamide injection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Subsequently, it has also been shown that linear agents in general interfere with the analytical determination of serum iron and that the macrocyclic agents do not. 38 The world of MR owes thanks to Thomas Grobner for his identification of the link between nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) and intravenous GBCA administration. 40 In a report published January 23, 2006, Dr Grobner described 5 patients in his dialysis unit who underwent contrast-enhanced MR angiography and then developed, within 2 to 4 weeks, thickening and induration of the skin, starting in the lower extremities and progressing to the trunk and upper extremities (with concomitant pain).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interference seen after gadodiamide and gadoversetamide administration has been concluded to be due to the dissociation of these gadolinium chelates, with macrocyclic chelates not producing any interference with analytical methods. 24 For example, in the presence of OCP (used for the calcium colorimetric assay), it has been shown that gadodiamide disappears and the free ligand and a new complex Gd-OCP appear. 24 In the case of circulating angiotensin-converting enzyme, an effect of the added free ligand, with gadodiamide and gadoversetamide, is likely.…”
Section: Interference With Analytical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 For example, in the presence of OCP (used for the calcium colorimetric assay), it has been shown that gadodiamide disappears and the free ligand and a new complex Gd-OCP appear. 24 In the case of circulating angiotensin-converting enzyme, an effect of the added free ligand, with gadodiamide and gadoversetamide, is likely. 22 In regard to the determination of serum iron and problems therein principally with gadodiamide and gadoversetamide, the situation would most likely arise only shortly after contrast administration or in patients with renal impairment.…”
Section: Interference With Analytical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation