2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2023.05.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical method for elastic-brittle-plastic analysis of a circular tunnel in a non-hydrostatic in-situ stress field considering the unified strength criterion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the rapid development of urban rail transit networks, increasing demands of smoothness and safety of the in-service tunnels when subjected to limitation of available underground space, will conduct unforeseen adverse impacts on or even seriously damage to the adjacent in-service tunnels (Fang et al, 2022;Gan et al, 2022;Wei and Jiang, 2021;Zhang et al, 2022). To ensure the serviceability of underlying shield tunnels, it is necessary to study responses of tunnel construction on the adjacent existing shield tunnels in the complex environment (Fang et al, 2023;Ma et al, 2023;Wei, 2023;Zhang et al, 2023a;Zhang et al, 2023b;Zhou et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid development of urban rail transit networks, increasing demands of smoothness and safety of the in-service tunnels when subjected to limitation of available underground space, will conduct unforeseen adverse impacts on or even seriously damage to the adjacent in-service tunnels (Fang et al, 2022;Gan et al, 2022;Wei and Jiang, 2021;Zhang et al, 2022). To ensure the serviceability of underlying shield tunnels, it is necessary to study responses of tunnel construction on the adjacent existing shield tunnels in the complex environment (Fang et al, 2023;Ma et al, 2023;Wei, 2023;Zhang et al, 2023a;Zhang et al, 2023b;Zhou et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a number of cavity contraction solutions were available for soils and rocks with various constitutive models, such as the Mohr-Coulomb model (Yu and Rowe 1999;Carranza-Torres 2003;Vrakas and Anagnostou 2014), Hoek-Brown failure criteria (Brown et al 1983;Zareifard 2020;Guan et al 2022;Cai et al 2023), strain hardening/softening Drucker-Prager model (Chen et al 2012;Chen and Abousleiman 2017), and critical state (Cam Clay) models (Yu and Rowe 1999; Chen and Abousleiman 2016; Mo and Yu 2017;Zhuang et al 2020). Also, some cavity contraction solutions were developed to investigate the influence of soil anisotropy (Chen H et al 2022), ground surface (Zhuang et al 2022), non-hydrostatic in-situ stress field (Ma et al 2023), seepage pressure (Sun et al 2023;Zhao et al 2023), and plane stress conditions (Yang et al 2022) on the characteristics of GRCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%