2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2009.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical methodologies for determination of artificial sweeteners in foodstuffs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
107
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
0
107
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Common types of artificial sweeteners include aspartame, acesulfame-K, cyclamate, neotame, sucralose, and saccharin. [10] Although artificial sweeteners have been welcomed into the food industry for its beneficial uses, some studies have found correlations between their use and illnesses such as cancers, hepatotoxicity, headaches, allergies, seizures, diarrhoea, and low birth weight. [9] Commercially available saccharin is almost 300-500 times sweeter than sucrose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Common types of artificial sweeteners include aspartame, acesulfame-K, cyclamate, neotame, sucralose, and saccharin. [10] Although artificial sweeteners have been welcomed into the food industry for its beneficial uses, some studies have found correlations between their use and illnesses such as cancers, hepatotoxicity, headaches, allergies, seizures, diarrhoea, and low birth weight. [9] Commercially available saccharin is almost 300-500 times sweeter than sucrose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, sucralose has also been subjected to toxicity screening. [10] Since their existence, the usage of natural and artificial sweeteners has been quite controversial. Their implication in various diseases has raised much questionability with respect to their safe use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, with product innovations and changing tastes among consumers, the concentrations of LCS within products are likely to evolve over time, potentially introducing error into subsequent estimates of exposure unless ongoing data are received from manufacturers. Another method for determining LCS concentrations in products is to directly measure them analytically and to this end, numerous methodologies for the determination of LCS in foods and beverages have been published (10) . Recent studies investigating LCS exposure have adopted this approach (50)(51)(52)(53)57,58) and, although it allows for a more accurate and objective measure of LCS concentrations in products, it is also likely to be costly.…”
Section: Methods Of Assessing Exposure To Low-calorie Sweetenersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has a sweetening strength about 450 times that of sucrose and exhibits high water solubility and storage stability [7]. In the 1980s, its consumption was linked with bladder cancer in rats and as such was prohibited in Canada [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike SAC, DUL does not have a bitter aftertaste and has a sweetening capacity about 250 times that of ft sucrose. However, DUL has not gained widespread use due to concerns over its toxicity [7]. It is not approved for use in the USA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%