2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical methods applied for ozone gas detection: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 At the ground level, the air quality standard for ozone is 60 ppb for 8 h. The concentration range recognized by OSHA for workstations as the occupational exposure limit (OEL) is 50-200 ppb, which is the recommended contact duration. 3,4 The primary source of ozone in the troposphere is the stratosphere, 5,6 while its second source is the photochemical reactions of NO x and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). 7 In the rst step, oxygen free radicals are formed due to the photolysis of nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 At the ground level, the air quality standard for ozone is 60 ppb for 8 h. The concentration range recognized by OSHA for workstations as the occupational exposure limit (OEL) is 50-200 ppb, which is the recommended contact duration. 3,4 The primary source of ozone in the troposphere is the stratosphere, 5,6 while its second source is the photochemical reactions of NO x and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). 7 In the rst step, oxygen free radicals are formed due to the photolysis of nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous analytical approaches, including UV/Visspectrometry, surface-enhanced Raman scattering, HPLC, electrochemical, chemiluminescence, and fluorescence techniques, have been applied for the detection of ozone. [31][32][33][34][35][36] However, fluorescence, chemiluminescence, and bioluminescence spectroscopic techniques have attracted a lot of interest from scientists because of their great sensitivity, outstanding selectivity, ease of operation, accuracy, affordability, quick response, low detection limits, non-invasive and nondestructive nature, high temporal and spatial resolution, and real-time monitoring capability in biological cells. [37][38][39][40][41] With this objective in mind, much effort has been expended over the past few decades to develop optical chemodosimeters (fluorescence, chemiluminescence, and bioluminescence) that can selectively detect O 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their ability to provide near real-time responses, low cost, low power supply requirements, and low weight and size, these sensors usually have limits of detection on the order of ppmv, and their applications in realworld scenarios are not well-grounded due to the lack of field validation and calibration. 21 Additionally, MOX-based sensors are highly affected by changes in relative humidity. 22,23 On the other hand, gas sensors based on chemical methods that rely on a chemical collection of the analyte by a renewable reagent solution have been seen as an excellent alternative for gas sensing.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%