2015
DOI: 10.4236/ijamsc.2015.32003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Methods in the Quality Control of Scientific Publications Part V: The Fraud of Pseudoscientists Based on False Measurements and Method Development

Abstract: Despite the obvious frauds published in [1] [2] and the involvement of Editors and Editors inChief of the journals in the publication of these fraudulent papers, the Editors in Chief of publishers have not taken any action to retract the fraudulent papers or to dismiss the corrupt editors. By this passivity, these Editors in Chief are supporting plagiarism, dissemination of fraudulent data, lies and making published information unreliable. In the present paper, we evaluate examples of bold, fraudulent publicat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The partisan presentation DOI: 10.4236/vp.2017. 33003 26 Voice of the Publisher of global climate change by media is clear and based on subsidies and grants to scientists and editors, such as those described in [1] [2] [3]. Despite this, even the stoutest narrow-minded person preserved the information about glaciation periods on the Earth at the back of his or her mind.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The partisan presentation DOI: 10.4236/vp.2017. 33003 26 Voice of the Publisher of global climate change by media is clear and based on subsidies and grants to scientists and editors, such as those described in [1] [2] [3]. Despite this, even the stoutest narrow-minded person preserved the information about glaciation periods on the Earth at the back of his or her mind.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We strongly hope that authorities, pharmacopeia committees, editors of professional journals and manufacturers of pharmaceutical products will not react to this discovery in the same way that they reacted to previous reports of the significant elevation of toxicity of contaminated primaquine (mixture of primaquine/quinocide) in comparison with pure primaquine, and will not act to suppress the findings of this paper or falsify the data as described previously [8]- [14]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As if this was not enough, a variation of the same fraudulent text was published again in [9]. The fraud was exposed in [10], and a critique of these two publications ( [8] and [9]) was also presented in [11]. Involvement of the pharmaceutical industry in false publications about drug quality via bribery of scientists with low ethics and who work at lower-tiered institutions has also been described [11]- [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%