2014
DOI: 10.1177/0954409713518039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical model for predicting the buckling load of continuous welded rail tracks

Abstract: Moreover, a parametrical study based on this model was developed, in order to understand how and how much the considered factors affect the track stability. The results of the survey indicated that the characteristics of the existing misalignments in the track were the most critical parameters involved in the phenomenon. Moreover, the maintenance operations that affect ballast, such as tamping or surfacing, and the dimensions and material of the track sleepers proved to be very important as well.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kerr 1 critically surveyed the results of most of the track buckling tests as well as the main theoretical analyses of track buckling published before 1975. In most of the studies carried out since then, in order to analyse the phenomenon in greater detail, an equivalent beam that having the same cross-section and rotational inertia as the real track [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] replaced the rail-sleeper structure. These beam models are quite intuitive, but they cannot take into account the strong influence of the torsional stiffness of the fasteners nor the effects of missing ties and fasteners, as the beams were continuously constrained to the ballast.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kerr 1 critically surveyed the results of most of the track buckling tests as well as the main theoretical analyses of track buckling published before 1975. In most of the studies carried out since then, in order to analyse the phenomenon in greater detail, an equivalent beam that having the same cross-section and rotational inertia as the real track [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] replaced the rail-sleeper structure. These beam models are quite intuitive, but they cannot take into account the strong influence of the torsional stiffness of the fasteners nor the effects of missing ties and fasteners, as the beams were continuously constrained to the ballast.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the resolution required many simplifications, limiting its applicability. Recently, Navarro et al 12 put forward a new buckling model, in which sleeper type, the passing of running vehicles, maintenance operations, type of misalignment and the variation of the ballast height were considered.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The misalignment shape is defined as a half sine wave, which corresponds with the typical post-buckling shape as defined by literature. 14,18…”
Section: Parametric Study On Three-dimensional Temporary Bridge Deck mentioning
confidence: 99%