2021
DOI: 10.1117/1.jatis.7.2.021209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical model for starshade formation flying with applications to exoplanet direct imaging observation scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Validation of the EXOSIMS code was performed in prior work. 30 EXOSIMS continues to improve the fidelity of starshade propulsion modeling, [31][32][33] integration time optimization, 34 and schedulers for various architectures and observing scenarios. 1,35 EXOSIMS is described in more detail in Sec.…”
Section: Approaches To Exoplanet Imaging Mission Yield Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Validation of the EXOSIMS code was performed in prior work. 30 EXOSIMS continues to improve the fidelity of starshade propulsion modeling, [31][32][33] integration time optimization, 34 and schedulers for various architectures and observing scenarios. 1,35 EXOSIMS is described in more detail in Sec.…”
Section: Approaches To Exoplanet Imaging Mission Yield Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 and then compare their analytical strategy under ideal conditions against numerical results from Ref. 3. This serves to validate the use of the inexpensive analytical model for stationkeeping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Analytical computation is described above, while the numerical computation is carried out with only gravitational effects averaging the delta-v for burns taking place over a 6-h period as in Ref. 3. The average delta-v is required here since the differential lateral acceleration is only nearly constant.…”
Section: Analytical Model Of Stationkeeping Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using differential lateral acceleration between the two spacecraft as a proxy for fuel use and number of required interruptions to the observation, we analyze the costs and timing metrics associated with maintaining the starshade in a nominal position, within some tolerance, to block out light from the given star. Our approach is in the same vein as previous analyses from [1][2][3]. We model the use of impulsive burns to maintain the starshade within a one meter lateral tolerance of the line of sight between telescope and target star [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy for deadbanding assumes constant differential acceleration between telescope and starshade. The authors of [3] further explored this strategy in a variety of scenarios, analyzing a wider variety of pertinent stationkeeping metrics. Both papers numerically solved ODEs with event driven application of the impulses to find stationkeeping metrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%