2018
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/27/3/030301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical model of tilted driver–pickup coils for eddy current nondestructive evaluation

Abstract: A driver-pickup probe possesses better sensitivity and flexibility due to individual optimization of a coil. It is frequently observed in an eddy current (EC) array probe. In this work, a tilted non-coaxial driver-pickup probe above a multilayered conducting plate is analytically modeled with spatial transformation for eddy current nondestructive evaluation. Basically, the core of the formulation is to obtain the projection of magnetic vector potential (MVP) from the driver coil onto the vector along the tilte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the skin depth of the induced eddy current is 0.15 mm, which is substantially smaller than the depth of the machined slot (with a minimum depth of 0.4 mm, as shown in Table 2). The eddy current is designed as a driver-pickup or T-R sensor instead of a single or co-axial sensor, which is verified to have a higher spatial resolution, which doubles the resolution of single-coil sensor of the same size [36], has a wider frequency range, higher gain, and is barely affected by thermal drift [37]. Moreover, as shown in Table 1, the mean radius of the coil winding is only 1 mm, which achieves a relatively high sensitivity on the voltage mapping of notches. )…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the skin depth of the induced eddy current is 0.15 mm, which is substantially smaller than the depth of the machined slot (with a minimum depth of 0.4 mm, as shown in Table 2). The eddy current is designed as a driver-pickup or T-R sensor instead of a single or co-axial sensor, which is verified to have a higher spatial resolution, which doubles the resolution of single-coil sensor of the same size [36], has a wider frequency range, higher gain, and is barely affected by thermal drift [37]. Moreover, as shown in Table 1, the mean radius of the coil winding is only 1 mm, which achieves a relatively high sensitivity on the voltage mapping of notches. )…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eddy current is designed as driver-pickup or T-R sensor instead of single or co-axial sensor, which is verified to having a higher spatial resolution, which doubles the resolution of single-coil sensor with the same size [36], wider frequency range, higher gain, and being barely affected by the thermal drift [37]. Moreover, as shown in Table 1, the mean radius of the coil winding is only 1 mm, which achieves a relatively high sensitivity on the voltage mapping of notches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A schematic of the T-R probe is shown in Figure 5. Compared with absolute probes with a single coil, T-R probes have a higher gain, have a wider frequency range, and are unaffected by thermal drift (Cao et al, 2018). In addition, the spatial resolution of T-R probes along a scan line is almost twice as high as that of absolute probes with the same coil size.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%