2013
DOI: 10.2514/1.a32391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Modeling of Supersonic Retropropulsion Plume Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To aid ongoing CFD efforts, an analytical modeling technique was developed for SRP-specific flow plume structures, providing insight to aid more computationally-expensive, higher-fidelity analyses. 10 This technique was shown to effectively determine plume structure and resulting bow shock structure for single and three nozzle SRP configurations. Higher-fidelity computation methods were shown to agree favorably with these analytical approaches for zero angle of attack configurations in Mach 2 freestream flow.…”
Section: Nasa Propulsive Descent Technologies Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To aid ongoing CFD efforts, an analytical modeling technique was developed for SRP-specific flow plume structures, providing insight to aid more computationally-expensive, higher-fidelity analyses. 10 This technique was shown to effectively determine plume structure and resulting bow shock structure for single and three nozzle SRP configurations. Higher-fidelity computation methods were shown to agree favorably with these analytical approaches for zero angle of attack configurations in Mach 2 freestream flow.…”
Section: Nasa Propulsive Descent Technologies Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SRP technology efforts in the past decade have been aeroscience dominated and focused on understanding aerodynamic-propulsive flowfield interactions during supersonic conditions. [10][11][12][13][14] Systems analysis, computational fluid dynamics simulations, and small-scale wind-tunnel testing [15][16] have not identified any propulsive-aerodynamic interaction showstoppers for this technology. Blunt body aeroshell configurations have been the focus of this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the work by Skeen does not model the flow field structure directly [18]. Cordell and Braun [19] showed that independent plume flow for multiple nozzle configurations could be modeled by leveraging past analytical works for plume terminal shock location [20] and the plume boundary [14]. Flow conditions related to the SRP environment, including both jet flow and freestream conditions, allow for determination of relevant boundary conditions in the determination of the plume structure [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work presented in this paper will extend the approach of Cordell and Braun [19] to create a modeling environment for generating full SRP flow field structures for peripheral configurations, including both plume and bow shock structures. For this analysis, it will be assumed that the vehicle is at zero angle of attack with a supersonic freestream.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%