2020
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-020-2139-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical modelling of single-walled carbon nanotube energies: the impact of curvature, length and temperature

Abstract: Recent breakthroughs in the field of single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) growth have been achieved by combining theoretical models with experiments. Theoretical models rely on accurate energies for SWCNTs, obtained via first principle calculations in the form of density functional theory (DFT). Such calculations are accurate, but time and resource intensive which limits the size and number of systems that can be studied. Here, we present a new analytical model consisting of three fundamental energy expressio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The armchair edge energy, E AC edge = 1.01 eV/Å, for graphene is lower than the zigzag edge energy, E ZZ edge = eV/Å, as predicted by DFT and consistent with the results obtained by Baran et al, 77 Li et al, 78 and Hedman and Larsson 79,80 Among the potentials, only GAP-20 and ReaxFF C2013 successfully predict this trend (E AC edge < E ZZ edge ). EDIP, LCBOP, ReacFF C2013 , and GAP-20 are within 5% of the DFT value for the armchair edge energy, but only GAP-20 is within 10% of the DFT calculated zigzag edge energy, showing that a high accuracy in energy is needed to correctly describe the relationship between armchair and zigzag edges.…”
Section: Ad-atom(s)supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The armchair edge energy, E AC edge = 1.01 eV/Å, for graphene is lower than the zigzag edge energy, E ZZ edge = eV/Å, as predicted by DFT and consistent with the results obtained by Baran et al, 77 Li et al, 78 and Hedman and Larsson 79,80 Among the potentials, only GAP-20 and ReaxFF C2013 successfully predict this trend (E AC edge < E ZZ edge ). EDIP, LCBOP, ReacFF C2013 , and GAP-20 are within 5% of the DFT value for the armchair edge energy, but only GAP-20 is within 10% of the DFT calculated zigzag edge energy, showing that a high accuracy in energy is needed to correctly describe the relationship between armchair and zigzag edges.…”
Section: Ad-atom(s)supporting
confidence: 88%
“…As shown, both growth and the formation and healing of interface defects occur at the tube-catalyst interface. Therefore, it becomes crucial to study how the tube-catalyst interface evolves, which has a direct impact on the current understanding of growth mechanisms [48][49][50][51][52] . By tracking the configuration of the SWCNT-edge during growth, the dynamics of the tube-catalyst interface can be studied.…”
Section: Dynamics Of the Tube-catalyst Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later research recognized the importance of configurational entropy [81] and the impact of curvature and armchair/zigzag junctions [82,83]. More recent advances have extended the concept of configurational entropy to include edges of any cut where the number of edge atoms remains constant [84].…”
Section: Edge Dynamics Of Growing Nanotubesmentioning
confidence: 99%