Volume 7: Structures and Dynamics, Parts a and B 2012
DOI: 10.1115/gt2012-69480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Prediction of Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior Under Biaxial Loadings

Abstract: Aircraft and pressure vessel components experience stresses that are negative biaxial or multiaxial in nature. Biaxiality is defined as the ratio of stress applied parallel and normal to the crack front. In recent years many experimental studies have been conducted on fatigue crack growth under various biaxial loading conditions. Biaxial loadings affect crack front stresses and strains, fatigue crack growth rate and direction, and crack tip plastic zone size and shape. Many of these studies have focused on pos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, his study neglected the effects of contact and friction on the crack extensional characteristics. Other studies on the effects of biaxial loading conditions, including the combined tensile and compressive loading conditions, have been conducted by Liebowitz et al (1978), Theocaris andMichopoulos (1983), Shetty et al (1987), and Zeng and Dai (1994), Shlyannikov (2013), Ge et al (2014), Kannusamy and Ramesh (2014), and Meek and Ainsworth (2015).…”
Section: R a F Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, his study neglected the effects of contact and friction on the crack extensional characteristics. Other studies on the effects of biaxial loading conditions, including the combined tensile and compressive loading conditions, have been conducted by Liebowitz et al (1978), Theocaris andMichopoulos (1983), Shetty et al (1987), and Zeng and Dai (1994), Shlyannikov (2013), Ge et al (2014), Kannusamy and Ramesh (2014), and Meek and Ainsworth (2015).…”
Section: R a F Tmentioning
confidence: 99%