2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-71649-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Solution for “EinStein würfelt nicht!” with One Stone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we will consider the opponent's pieces as they appear on the path of movement or strategically reduce the player's own number of pieces to increase the chances of movement for other pieces. Additionally, integrating the utilization of opening [13] and endgame databases [29,30] and incorporating calculations based on the Nash equilibrium [26,40] are also worth considering. These ideas may enhance the accuracy of the simulation results and further elevate the program's performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, we will consider the opponent's pieces as they appear on the path of movement or strategically reduce the player's own number of pieces to increase the chances of movement for other pieces. Additionally, integrating the utilization of opening [13] and endgame databases [29,30] and incorporating calculations based on the Nash equilibrium [26,40] are also worth considering. These ideas may enhance the accuracy of the simulation results and further elevate the program's performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu et al [22] discussed the optimal placement of pieces on the initial board to increase the chances of winning. Furthermore, Bonnet and Viennot [30] not only analyzed the optimal solutions when both players have only one piece remaining but also calculated the optimal winning probability on a 4 × 4 board size using the Nash equilibrium [26].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%