2019
DOI: 10.1177/0144598719842335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical solution of Buckley-Leverett equation for gas flooding including the effect of miscibility with constant-pressure boundary

Abstract: This paper presents an analytical solution of Buckley-Leverett equation for gas flooding with constant-pressure boundary including the effect of miscibility on the viscosity and relative permeability. First, a relative permeability model and a viscosity model with consideration of miscibility are used to describe the variations of relative permeability and viscosity of oil and gas. Then, based on the fractional-flow theory, the Buckley-Leverett equation for gas flooding with constantpressure boundary including… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hardly any dependence on n s was observed. The results follow an almost linear trend which is typical for fluids with low interfacial tension [53]. Moreover, as both fluids have identical properties (cf.…”
Section: Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Hardly any dependence on n s was observed. The results follow an almost linear trend which is typical for fluids with low interfacial tension [53]. Moreover, as both fluids have identical properties (cf.…”
Section: Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 61%
“… Comparison of simulated value of fractional flow at gas viscosity of 0.035 mPa s three injection pressures of 30, 22, and 14 MPa with the results of Mu et al 43 . …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…
Figure 2 Comparison of the simulated value solution gas-oil ratio, oil formation volume factor, oil density, and relative gas and oil permeability.
Figure 3 Comparison of simulated value of fractional flow at gas viscosity of 0.035 mPa s three injection pressures of 30, 22, and 14 MPa with the results of Mu et al 43 .
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The software also significantly eases the definition of physical models at the frontend and the solving of data at the backend. This comparison method has been implemented in numerous publications, ,, although such comparisons focus on differences in solution methods rather than physical contrasts; it is, however, an effective way to verify the results. Figure presents the gas saturation profiles during 365 days of the CO 2 injection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%